C
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.1 β Who is subject | Defines who must comply with Part 111. | Any entity that manufactures, packages, labels, or holds dietary supplements is subject to Part 111. Includes contract manufacturers and firms that produce supplements for others. | APPLIES | SNL contract manufacturing fits directly into the regulated category. |
| 111.3 β Definitions | Provides definitions used throughout Part 111. | Defines key regulatory concepts such as component, contamination, quality control, physical plant, batch, reserve sample, etc., which govern how requirements must be interpreted. | APPLIES | All downstream requirements rely on these definitions; they apply universally. |
| 111.5 β Relationship to other regulations | Clarifies Part 111 does not replace other legal obligations. | Explains that manufacturers must comply with all other applicable statutory provisions and regulations relating to dietary supplements, including those governing imported ingredients. | PARTIAL | Applicable for general compliance, but does not impose specific operational controls for dry CMO activities. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.8 β Illness & Disease Control | Employees must not contaminate product. | Personnel exhibiting illness, infection, or open lesions must be excluded from operations where they could contaminate components or dietary supplements. | APPLIES | Directly impacts product integrity in dry blending, encapsulation, and packaging operations. |
| 111.10 β Personnel Hygiene Practices | Personnel must follow hygiene practices. | Requires appropriate personal cleanliness, handwashing, protective apparel, and restrictions against unsanitary practices such as eating or smoking in production areas. | APPLIES | Essential GMP requirement for all manufacturing environments including dry processing. |
| 111.12 β Personnel Qualification & Oversight | Personnel must be qualified for their duties. | Requires education, training, experience, and supervision sufficient to ensure proper performance. Training must be documented and periodically reviewed. | APPLIES | Training + qualification is foundational for all SOPs, WINs, and Batch Record execution. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.15 β Sanitary Operations | Facility must be maintained in sanitary condition. | Requires clean, sanitary facilities free of pests, waste, hazards, and contamination sources. Includes proper handling of cleaning compounds and toxic materials. | APPLIES | Dry powders are highly susceptible to cross-contamination; sanitation is critical. |
| 111.20 β Physical Plant & Grounds | Facility design must prevent contamination. | Requires facility layout, grounds maintenance, water systems, airflow systems, lighting, drainage, and construction suitable to prevent contamination. | PARTIAL | All facility requirements apply, but water-as-component requirements are N/A for dry processing. |
| 111.23 β Facility Cleaning & Pest Control Records | Requires records of cleaning and pest control. | Requires written procedures and documented evidence of facility cleaning, pest control, and water-use compliance where water may contact product. | APPLIES | Pest control + facility cleaning documentation are essential for powders/capsules operations. |
| 111.27 β Equipment & Utensils (Cleaning, Maintenance, Controls) | Equipment must be maintained to prevent contamination. | Requires cleaning of product-contact surfaces, control of equipment construction materials, maintenance schedules, and inspection prior to use to prevent contamination. | APPLIES | Dry processing relies on clean, residue-free equipment to avoid cross-lot contamination. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.8 β Illness & Disease Control | Employees who could contaminate product must be restricted. | Personnel exhibiting illness, open lesions, or infectious conditions must be excluded from operations where contamination of components or dietary supplements could occur. Firms must implement a program ensuring such risks are identified and controlled. | APPLIES | Directly affects product safety in blending, encapsulation, dispensing, and packaging areas. |
| 111.10 β Personnel Hygiene Practices | Personnel must maintain hygienic practices. | Employees must follow hygienic procedures including handwashing, wearing protective apparel, avoiding unsanitary practices (e.g., eating, drinking, smoking), and adhering to facility hygiene protocols. Requirements also extend to maintaining clothing cleanliness and minimizing contamination risks. | APPLIES | Essential for dry powder operations where airborne cross-contamination and foreign material risks are high. |
| 111.12 β Personnel Qualification & Oversight | Personnel must be qualified by education, training, or experience. | Establishes qualification requirements for employees performing operations governed by Part 111. All personnel must receive training in GMPs and job-specific duties. Supervisors must ensure ongoing competency, with training documented and periodically evaluated. | APPLIES | Foundational control for all GMP operations: weighing, blending, encapsulation, packaging, QC, sanitation, and QA review. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.15 β Sanitary Operations | Requires clean, sanitary facility conditions. | Firms must maintain the physical plant in sanitary condition to prevent contamination. Requirements include proper storage and use of cleaning compounds, safe handling of toxic materials, waste removal, drainage, and control of contaminants. Environmental conditions must be managed to protect components and supplements. | APPLIES | Dry powder operations require strict control of cross-contamination, allergens, airborne particulates, and sanitation chemical residues. |
| 111.15(d) β Pest Control | Requires exclusion and control of pests. | Manufacturers must take effective measures to exclude pests and prevent contamination of components, dietary supplements, and contact surfaces. Pest control must be documented and performed in a manner that prevents chemical or physical contamination. | APPLIES | Pest activity poses direct contamination risk to exposed powders and capsules; standard GMP requirement. |
| 111.15(e) β Water Supply & Quality | Water must be safe and adequate for its use. | This section establishes requirements for the quality and control of water used in manufacturing, including microbial specifications when water may become a component or contact surface. Firms must ensure water systems do not contaminate product under their intended use. | PARTIAL | Dry-processing CMOs do not use water as a component, so microbial specifications for water entering product do not apply; however, water may be used for facility cleaning or handwashing and must be safe for these uses. |
| 111.20 β Physical Plant & Grounds | Facilities must be designed and maintained to prevent contamination. | Requirements include maintaining grounds to prevent attracting pests, ensuring facility construction supports sanitary operations, providing adequate space to prevent mixups, and controlling airflow, ventilation, temperature, and humidity as appropriate. | APPLIES | Dry powder handling requires strict control of air movement, particulate flow, equipment spacing, and dust migration to protect product integrity and prevent cross-contamination. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.25(a) β Equipment Design & Construction | Equipment must be suitable, cleanable, and prevent contamination. | Equipment and utensils must be of appropriate design, construction, and workmanship to ensure they are adequately cleanable, do not contribute contaminants, and are suitable for their intended use. Surfaces must be non-reactive, non-absorptive, and corrosion-resistant. | APPLIES | Dry processing requires equipment that prevents cross-contamination, material buildup, and foreign material introduction (blenders, mills, hoppers, encapsulators, feeders). |
| 111.25(b) β Equipment Installation & Maintenance | Equipment must be installed and maintained to prevent contamination. | Firms must install equipment in a manner that facilitates cleaning, inspection, and maintenance. Preventive maintenance and routine servicing must support control of contamination sources and maintain equipment performance integrity. | APPLIES | Proper maintenance prevents residue accumulation, lubrication contamination, and equipment breakdowns during powder handling and encapsulation. |
| 111.25(c) β Calibration of Instruments | Instruments used for control must be calibrated. | Any instruments or controls used to measure, regulate, or record conditions such as weight, temperature, humidity, pressure, or torque must be routinely calibrated and checked to ensure accuracy and reliability. | APPLIES | Critical for scales, load cells, torque meters, encapsulation equipment, and environmental monitors used throughout dry manufacturing operations. |
| 111.25(d) β Written Procedures for Equipment | Written equipment procedures are required. | Firms must establish and implement written procedures for cleaning, maintaining, sanitizing (as applicable), calibrating, and inspecting equipment. Procedures must define responsibilities, frequency, and acceptance criteria. | APPLIES | Supports SOP-PROD-PREOP, SOP-SAN-CLEAN, SOP-MAINT-PM, and SOP-MAINT-CAL; essential to prevent lapses in cleaning and operational readiness in a CMO environment. |
| 111.25(e) β Cleaning & Sanitizing Equipment | Equipment must be cleaned to prevent contamination. | Manufacturers must clean and, where necessary, sanitize equipment to prevent contamination. Cleaning must be effective at removing residue and preventing cross-contamination between batches and products. | APPLIES | Dry-process equipment requires thorough dry cleaning to remove powder residues and allergens; sanitization may be chemical/dry sanitization rather than wet CIP/SIP. |
| 111.25(f) β Inspection of Equipment | Inspect equipment to ensure proper operation. | Equipment must be inspected before use to confirm cleanliness, proper assembly, and operational readiness. Defects must be corrected or equipment must be removed from service. | APPLIES | Pre-op inspections are critical for ensuring no residual powder, tooling defects, or assembly issues exist prior to processing new lots. |
| 111.25(g) β Lubricants & Coolants | Lubricants/coolants must not contaminate product. | Any lubricants or coolants used in conjunction with equipment must be food-grade where they may contact product, and must be applied in a manner that prevents contamination and supports safe operation. | APPLIES | Encapsulation and blending equipment often require lubrication; improper control is a contamination risk. |
| 111.25(h) β Holding & Storage of Cleaned Equipment | Clean equipment must be stored to prevent contamination. | Firms must protect cleaned equipment from dust, moisture, pests, or other contaminants during storage, ensuring equipment remains in a ready-to-use condition. | APPLIES | Clean hoppers, totes, bins, and encapsulation tooling must be protected from airborne powders and allergens. |
| 111.25(i) β Equipment Logbooks | Must document use, cleaning, maintenance, and calibration. | Each piece of major equipment must have a log that records cleaning, sanitization (if applicable), maintenance, repairs, calibration, and use to ensure traceability and readiness. | APPLIES | Essential in a CMO setting for batch traceability, cross-contamination prevention, and customer transparency. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.35(a) β Written Procedures for Production & Process Control | Firms must have written procedures for all manufacturing operations. | Requires written instructions describing all manufacturing operations, including responsibilities, process controls, monitoring, sampling, corrective actions, and documentation requirements. Procedures must ensure uniformity and quality across batches. | APPLIES | All SNL manufacturing operations (weighing, blending, encapsulation, packaging) require defined SOPs and WINs. |
| 111.35(b)(1) β Monitoring Operations | Manufacturing operations must be monitored. | Personnel must monitor and control processes to ensure operations are performed as specified. Monitoring results must be recorded and available for QC review. | APPLIES | IPC checks, equipment settings, blend times, and encapsulation parameters all require active monitoring. |
| 111.35(b)(2) β Use of Instruments & Controls | Instruments used must be accurate and reliable. | Any instruments used to measure, regulate, or record critical operating parameters must be calibrated, maintained, and appropriate for their intended use. Documentation of calibration and checks is required. | APPLIES | Critical for scales, torque meters, temperature/humidity instruments, and load cells in blending and encapsulation. |
| 111.35(b)(3) β Corrective Actions | Corrective actions must be taken when deviations occur. | Manufacturers must identify deviations from written procedures or specifications, determine their impact on product quality, and take corrective actions. All actions must be documented and reviewed by QC. | APPLIES | Deviations in blend times, weights, equipment settings, or IPC failures require immediate correction and documentation. |
| 111.35(b)(4) β Documentation of Manufacturing Operations | Firms must document all monitored results and actions. | All monitoring, adjustments, and corrective actions must be contemporaneously recorded. Documentation supports batch record integrity and QC batch release decisions. | APPLIES | Batch records, IPC sheets, and equipment logs are critical evidence for release review. |
| 111.35(b)(5) β Electronic Records & Backup | Electronic data must be backed up. | Electronic records, if used, must be protected from loss, alteration, or deterioration. Firms must keep secure, retrievable electronic backups. | PARTIAL | SNL maintains electronic systems (e.g., training records, maintenance logs) but does not run a full eBR/MES. |
| 111.35(d) β Responsibilities of Quality Control Personnel | QC must review and approve controls. | QC must approve or reject all processes, specifications, monitoring activities, deviations, and corrective actions. QC review ensures all requirements are met before batch release. | APPLIES | Contracts for third-party manufacturing require QC independence and documented approval of all GMP controls. |
| 111.50 β Process Control Documentation Requirements | Documentation must show that procedures were followed. | Requires documented evidence that manufacturing steps were carried out as described in written procedures, including dates, times, responsible personnel, instrument readings, and deviations. Records must enable traceability from raw materials to finished product. | APPLIES | Batch production records, equipment logs, and IPC documentation all support release decisions and audits. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.55 β Establishing Specifications | Specifications are required for all critical materials and processes. | Manufacturers must establish written specifications for components, in-process production, labels, packaging, and finished products. Specifications must ensure identity, purity, strength, and composition, as well as prevent contamination. QC must review and approve all specifications. | APPLIES | SNL must maintain component, in-process, and label specifications for blending, encapsulation, and packaging. |
| 111.60 β Conformance to Specifications | Materials must meet specifications before use. | Requires verification that components and packaging materials meet established specifications before they are used in manufacturing. QC must approve or reject materials based on test results and documentation. | APPLIES | Component identity testing and COA review are core CMO responsibilities before production begins. |
| 111.65 β Quality Control Operations | QC must review and approve all manufacturing-related actions. | QC must review and approve all specifications, monitoring results, testing, deviations, corrective actions, and batch production records. QC has final authority to release or reject materials and finished batches. | APPLIES | Central to contract manufacturing where QC must independently ensure specification compliance before release. |
| 111.70(a) β Component Specifications | Specifications must ensure component identity and quality. | Manufacturers must establish identity specifications for each component and appropriate purity, strength, and composition limits as needed. Identity testing must be performed for every component lot, unless exempt. | APPLIES | Full identity testing of components is mandatory for every manufacturing lot handled by SNL. |
| 111.70(b) β In-Process Specifications | In-process controls must ensure product quality. | Firms must establish in-process specifications for manufacturing stepsβsuch as blend times, weights, encapsulation parameters, and other measurable criteriaβto ensure batch uniformity and consistency. | APPLIES | Blending and encapsulation operations require IPC controls such as torque, fill weight, and uniformity checks. |
| 111.70(c) β Final Product Specifications | Finished product must meet defined specifications. | Manufacturers must establish specifications for identity, purity, strength, composition, and limits on contaminants for finished products. These specifications must support QC batch disposition decisions. | APPLIES | Finished product specifications ensure batches produced by SNL meet customer and regulatory requirements. |
| 111.70(d) β Packaging & Label Specifications | Packaging and labels must meet predefined criteria. | Specifications must ensure packaging and labels protect product quality and accurately represent content. Packaging materials must be suitable and not contaminate or degrade product. Label content must match master manufacturing and marketing approvals. | APPLIES | Direct connection to SOP-PKG-LABEL, SOP-WH-STOR, and label issuance controls required by NSF 455-2. |
| 111.70(e) β Manufacturing Process Controls | Controls must ensure specifications are met. | Manufacturers must implement manufacturing controlsβincluding environmental controls, equipment settings, and operator actionsβto produce a batch that meets established specifications. | APPLIES | Applies to blending, encapsulation, material handling, and packaging lines; ensures reproducibility of each batch. |
| 111.70(f) β Contamination Prevention | Steps must prevent contamination and mixups. | Manufacturers must implement controls to prevent contamination, adulteration, cross-contact, mixups, and foreign material introduction during manufacturing, packaging, labeling, and holding. | APPLIES | Dry powders and allergens pose high cross-contamination risks; this requirement is essential for SNL operations. |
| 111.70(g) β Reprocessing Requirements | Reprocessing must not compromise quality. | Manufacturers may reprocess a batch only if reprocessing does not compromise identity, purity, strength, composition, or quality. QC must review and approve reprocessing procedures and final results. | PARTIAL | SNL reprocessing is limited (e.g., reblending powders); must still meet full specification and QC review requirements. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.103 β QC Responsibilities & Oversight | QC must oversee all quality-related operations. | Defines QCβs overarching responsibility to ensure manufacturing, packaging, labeling, and holding operations meet specifications. QC must verify that deviations are investigated and that corrective actions are taken. | APPLIES | Core requirement establishing QC independence in all contract manufacturing operations. |
| 111.105 β QC Review & Approval Requirements | QC must review and approve all controlled processes. | QC must approve or reject all specifications, monitoring activities, test results, manufacturing deviations, reprocessing, and batch production records. QC ensures GMP compliance before batch release. | APPLIES | SNL QC must formally review and approve all GMP documents and records that affect product quality. |
| 111.110 β Handling of Material Review & Disposition | QC must evaluate and decide on material disposition. | Requires QC to review and approve all material disposition decisions, including rejection, rework, or release. QC must document rationale and ensure rejected materials are quarantined and not used without approval. | APPLIES | Directly tied to SNL QAβs NCMR/Deviation/CAPA processes and release controls. |
| 111.113 β QC Review of Manufacturing Deviations | QC must evaluate the impact of deviations. | When a deviation occurs, QC must determine whether the deviation affects product quality and must approve or reject related corrective actions, reprocessing, or disposition decisions. | APPLIES | Ties directly to SOP-QA-DEV and SOP-QA-CAPA for formal investigation and approval. |
| 111.117 β QC Review of Laboratory Operations | QC must oversee testing and laboratory results. | QC must review and approve all laboratory test results, ensure test methods are appropriate, and verify that specifications are met. QC also evaluates OOS and atypical results. | PARTIAL | SNL performs limited in-house ID testing; other testing is performed by accredited third-party labs but still requires QC review and approval. |
| 111.120 β QC Review of Packaging & Labeling | QC must approve packaging and labeling controls. | QC must verify that label issuance, reconciliation, packaging operations, and printed content conform to specifications before product release. | APPLIES | Critical for preventing mislabeling, a leading cause of Class II recalls in dietary supplements. |
| 111.123 β QC Review of Returned Products | QC must evaluate and approve returned product handling. | QC must determine whether returned product may be salvaged, requires investigation, or must be destroyed. Must ensure returned goods are quarantined until final disposition. | APPLIES | SOP-QA-RETURNS governs all CMO returned product assessments and QC approval steps. |
| 111.127 β QC Release for Distribution | QC must release product only after full review. | QC must approve final batch disposition based on complete review of the batch production record, test results, packaging records, deviations, and corrective actions. | APPLIES | Contract manufacturing requires documented QC release prior to shipment to customer. |
| 111.135 β QC Rejection of Batches | QC must reject any batch failing to meet specifications. | If a batch fails specifications or GMP requirements, QC must document the rejection, ensure the batch is not distributed, and verify disposition is properly controlled. | APPLIES | Essential control in a CMO environment where batch failures affect customer obligations and regulatory compliance. |
| 111.140 β QC Documentation Requirements | QC actions must be documented. | QC must maintain records of approvals, rejections, oversight activities, investigations, sampling plans, testing, and release decisions to ensure compliance with all Part 111 requirements. | APPLIES | All QC responsibilities (testing review, batch release, deviations) must be documented for audit-readiness. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.153 β Receipt, Quarantine & Evaluation of Components | All components must be quarantined and evaluated upon receipt. | Manufacturers must receive, identify, and quarantine components (raw materials, excipients, capsules) until QC reviews documentation and test results. Components must not be released until specifications are met and QC approval is granted. | APPLIES | Foundational control for a CMO; applies to all incoming powders, capsules, excipients, and materials. |
| 111.155 β Source & Documentation Requirements | Sources & documentation must support component quality. | Firms must maintain documentation for each component lot, including supplier identity, shipment containers, and verification that the material matches purchase requirements. COAs must be reviewed for completeness and accuracy. | APPLIES | PROC + WH must ensure supplier documentation is valid and supports QC identity verification. |
| 111.160 β Testing & Examination of Components | Identity testing of every component lot is required. | Manufacturers must conduct at least one appropriate test to verify the identity of each component. Other specifications (purity, strength, contaminants) may rely on COA if the supplier has been qualified and the COA is verified periodically. | APPLIES | Identity testing (e.g., FTIR) is mandatory for ALL lots used in blending or encapsulation. |
| 111.165 β Handling of Component Testing & COA Verification | COA testing must be periodically verified. | If relying on supplier COAs for specifications beyond identity, firms must periodically verify the COA through their own testing program to confirm supplier reliability. | PARTIAL | SNL does not perform full analytical testing in-house; verification is performed by accredited 3rd-party labs. |
| 111.170 β Component Approval or Rejection | Components must be approved by QC before use. | QC must approve or reject each component lot based on identity testing, COA review, and compliance with specifications. Rejected materials must be clearly identified and quarantined. | APPLIES | All components must be QC-approved before being released to production for blending or encapsulation. |
| 111.175 β Packaging & Label Control Systems | Controls must prevent mixups and mislabeling. | Manufacturers must establish controls for label issuance, reconciliation, storage, and application. Packaging materials must meet specifications and must not contaminate the product. | APPLIES | Critical for CMO packaging operations to prevent mislabeling, a top cause of FDA recalls. |
| 111.180 β Material Status & Inventory Control | Status of all materials must be clearly identified. | Manufacturers must identify the status of each lot (e.g., quarantined, approved, rejected) and maintain inventory controls that prevent mixups and unauthorized use of materials. | APPLIES | Warehouse and production must coordinate to ensure FEFO/FIFO, status labeling, and segregation are maintained. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.205 β Requirement to Prepare and Follow an MMR | Each unique formulation must have an approved MMR. | The MMR provides the complete manufacturing instructions for each product, including components, weights, equipment, processing steps, environmental conditions, in-process controls, and expected yields. Manufacturers must prepare and maintain an MMR for each formulation and strength. | APPLIES | Every contract-manufactured powder or capsule product requires a unique MMR to ensure reproducibility. |
| 111.210 β Required Elements of an MMR | MMR must contain specific required information. | Defines mandatory MMR content, including: product name, strength, dosage form; complete list of components; theoretical and expected yields; complete manufacturing instructions; blending & encapsulation parameters; in-process tests; packaging instructions; and label copy. QC must review and approve the MMR before use. | APPLIES | Essential for controlling powder blending, encapsulation, and packaging processes; ensures BPR consistency. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.255 β Requirement to Prepare a BPR | A BPR must be prepared for every batch. | Manufacturers must prepare a Batch Production Record (BPR) for each batch, derived from and consistent with the Master Manufacturing Record (MMR). The BPR must document all manufacturing steps, materials, equipment, operators, in-process controls, deviations, and yields. | APPLIES | Every powder or capsule batch produced by SNL requires a complete, traceable BPR for release. |
| 111.260 β Required Elements of a BPR | BPR must include specific required information. | Defines mandatory BPR content: component lot numbers, weights, equipment IDs, processing dates/times, operator signatures/initials, in-process test results, label issuance records, deviations, environmental checks, cleaning verifications, actual yields vs. theoretical, and QC review signatures. | APPLIES | Supports traceability and ensures the batch was produced exactly according to its MMR and GMP requirements. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.303 β Requirements for Laboratory Operations | Laboratory operations must ensure valid test results. | Firms must conduct laboratory operations using scientifically valid methods, appropriate equipment, trained personnel, and documented procedures. All testing must verify that specifications are met. | APPLIES | SNL conducts identity testing in-house and relies on 3rd-party labs for other analyses; requirements still apply to oversight. |
| 111.310 β Laboratory Equipment & Calibration | Lab equipment must be suitable and calibrated. | All laboratory instruments must be appropriately designed, maintained, and calibrated. Calibration and maintenance records must be maintained to ensure accuracy and reliability of test results. | PARTIAL | Applies fully to FTIR and sampling tools used by SNL; more complex analytical equipment exists only at contract labs. |
| 111.315 β Laboratory Control Processes | Labs must follow procedures for control of testing processes. | Requires procedures for sample handling, labeling, storage, method validation, reagent control, and maintenance of laboratory environments to ensure integrity of analytical results. | PARTIAL | SNL controls ID testing internally; all other testing controls are delegated to accredited 3rd-party labs with QA oversight. |
| 111.320 β Testing to Verify Specifications | Testing must confirm specifications are met. | Manufacturers must verify that components, in-process materials, and finished goods meet established specifications through appropriate testing. Testing must be scientifically valid and documented. | APPLIES | Identity testing is mandatory for every lot; additional testing is performed by external labs but still requires QC review. |
| 111.325 β Laboratory Documentation Requirements | Testing must be documented fully. | Results must include sample identification, test method, analyst, materials used, equipment IDs, calibration records, calculations, and final approval. All results must be reviewed by QC. | APPLIES | ID test records, COA verification, and 3rd-party test reviews are core QA responsibilities for batch release. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.353 β Manufacturing Process Controls | Manufacturing must consistently produce quality product. | Firms must implement manufacturing controls to ensure the identity, purity, strength, and composition of dietary supplements. Controls must prevent contamination, mixups, and ensure uniformity across batches. | APPLIES | Critical for blending, encapsulation, sieving, and material handling operations in a dry-processing environment. |
| 111.355 β Cleaning Requirements for Manufacturing Areas | Manufacturing areas must be cleaned to prevent contamination. | Firms must maintain manufacturing areas in a clean and sanitary condition, removing dust, residues, and potential contaminants that may affect product quality or cross-contact between lots. | APPLIES | Dry powder environments require strict dust control and allergen cleaning validations. |
| 111.360 β Inspection of Manufacturing Areas | Manufacturing areas must be inspected before use. | Before starting operations, firms must inspect manufacturing areas to ensure they are clean, free of residual materials, and properly prepared for the next batch. Documentation of inspections is required. | APPLIES | Pre-op checks are essential to avoid cross-contamination between batches. |
| 111.365 β Prevention of Contamination & Mixups | Systems must prevent contamination, mixups, and cross-contact. | Firms must implement controls to prevent contamination from foreign materials, improper handling, inadequate cleaning, and mixups of components or batches. Controls include proper equipment assembly, line clearance, segregation of materials, allergen control, and environmental controls. | APPLIES | Central to dry CMO operations due to dust migration, allergen risks, over/under-fill issues, and tooling mixups. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.403 β Requirements for Packaging Operations | Packaging must protect product quality and prevent contamination. | Packaging operations must be designed and controlled to protect dietary supplements from contamination, deterioration, or mixups. Packaging materials must be suitable for the product based on formulation, environmental conditions, and intended use. | APPLIES | SNL conducts bottle filling, capping, labeling, and sealingβrequires strict control of environment and materials. |
| 111.410 β Label Control System | A label control system must prevent mixups. | Manufacturers must implement systems for receiving, reviewing, storing, issuing, reconciling, and disposing labels. Labels must be stored securely, issued by version, and reconciled after each batch to prevent application of incorrect or outdated labels. | APPLIES | Preventing mislabeling is essential; this is one of FDAβs top causes of supplement recalls. |
| 111.415 β Packaging & Labeling Operations | Packaging lines must be set up and operated correctly. | Packaging procedures must ensure the right label is applied to the correct product, including line clearance, equipment setup, environmental control, and reconciliation of packaging materials. Any unused labels must be accounted for to prevent future mixups. | APPLIES | Line clearance and material control are core requirements for dry powder/capsule bottling lines. |
| 111.417 β Suitability of Packaging Materials | Packaging materials must not contaminate the product. | Manufacturers must ensure packaging materials (bottles, lids, seals, scoops, desiccants) are safe, non-reactive, and appropriate for the dietary supplement. Materials must not degrade or compromise product identity, purity, strength, or composition. | APPLIES | Packaging components used by SNL must meet safety and compatibility standards for powders/capsules. |
| 111.420 β Labeling Checks | Must verify correct label is applied. | Manufacturers must perform checks to ensure correct labels are applied during packaging. Checks must be documented and performed at necessary intervals to prevent mislabeling or incorrect product presentation. | APPLIES | SOP-PKG-LABEL and SOP-PKG-PACK require label verification for each batch and during changeovers. |
| 111.430 β Packaging Labeling Records | Packaging operations must be documented. | Records must include packaging line setup, label version, counts, reconciliation results, operator initials, deviations, and corrective actions. Records ensure accurate traceability and QC review. | APPLIES | Required for full traceability and QC release documentation in contract packaging environments. |
| 111.460 β Tamper-Evident Packaging (If Applicable) | Requires tamper-evident features if product requires them. | Where applicable, manufacturers must use tamper-evident packaging systems designed to prevent or reveal tampering. These systems must be validated and inspected for integrity during packaging. | PARTIAL | Most dietary supplement bottles use induction seals/shrink bands; applicability depends on customer requirements. |
| 111.470 β Defects, Deviations & Corrective Actions | Defects and deviations must be addressed and documented. | Manufacturers must investigate deviations or defects occurring in packaging and labeling operations, determine their impact on product quality, and take corrective actions. QA must review and approve findings. | APPLIES | All packaging deviationsβincluding mislabels, incorrect seals, torque failuresβrequire QA oversight. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.503 β Returned Product Handling | Returned product must be quarantined and evaluated. | Manufacturers must clearly identify and quarantine returned products before evaluation. QC must determine whether the product may be salvaged, reprocessed, distributed, or destroyed based on documented assessment. | APPLIES | Returns must be assessed by QA to prevent release of compromised supplements back into distribution. |
| 111.510 β Investigations of Returned Products | Returned products must be investigated when quality is questionable. | If evidence suggests contamination, mishandling, or damage, manufacturers must investigate the cause, document findings, and determine disposition. Investigation may require review of complaint data, distribution records, or environmental factors. | APPLIES | QA must investigate any returns that indicate quality or safety concerns, especially where storage conditions are unknown. |
| 111.515 β Salvage of Returned Products | Returned product may be salvaged only if quality is ensured. | Manufacturers may salvage returned products only when evidence demonstrates the product meets specifications and has not deteriorated or become contaminated. Salvage operations must be documented and reviewed by QC. | PARTIAL | Dry CMO salvage is rare and limited; customer approval is typically required in addition to QC oversight. |
| 111.520 β Returned Product Disposition | Returned product disposition must be controlled. | Products that cannot be salvaged must be destroyed or otherwise disposed of in a manner that prevents unintended use. Records must document the disposition decision and method of destruction. | APPLIES | QA must document and control destruction of returned goods to maintain traceability and transparency to customers. |
| 111.535 β Material Review & Disposition | MRB must evaluate nonconforming materials. | Firms must establish procedures for the review and disposition of materials that fail specifications or GMP requirements. QC must approve the final decision and ensure rejected materials are not used. | APPLIES | All raw materials, in-process blends, and finished goods that fail testing or specification checks require MRB review. |
| 111.560 β Product Complaint Handling | Complaints must be reviewed, investigated, and documented. | Manufacturers must investigate product complaints when quality, safety, or labeling issues may be involved. Investigations must be documented, reviewed by QC, and linked to deviations, CAPA, or MRB processes as needed. | APPLIES | Customer-reported complaints related to powders/capsules require QA investigation and trending to ensure product quality. |
| 111.570 β Salvaging Operations (General) | Salvaging must not compromise quality. | Any salvage operations (reworking, reblending, re-cleaning, or repackaging) must not compromise identity, purity, strength, composition, or quality. QC must approve and document all salvage operations. | PARTIAL | Dry CMO salvage operations are minimal; reblending may occur only with customer consent and QC oversight. |
| CFR Section | Concise Summary | Detailed Summary | Applicability | Justification (Dry CMO Context) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.553 β Complaint Handling Requirements | Requires written procedures to handle complaints. | Manufacturers must establish and implement written procedures to handle product complaints. Procedures must describe intake, evaluation, investigation, documentation, escalation to QC, determination of whether the complaint involves possible contamination or mislabeling, and required corrective actions. QC must review and approve complaint investigations and associated decisions. | APPLIES | Customers often report complaints to SNLβs clients; SNL must conduct GMP investigations when manufacturing or packaging is implicated (e.g., contamination, fill-weight issues, mislabeling, foreign material). |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Governance Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.1 β Who Must Comply | Establishes that all dietary supplement manufacturers must comply with Part 111. | β Missing | Scope omission | Add Subpart A entry defining regulatory scope and applicability to SNL. | L0 Governance Preface | |
| 111.3 β Definitions | Lists definitions used throughout Part 111. | β Partial | Definitions missing or misaligned | Cite that L0 glossary inherits definitions from 111.3 without restating them. | L0 Definitions Section | |
| 111.5 β Dietary Supplement CGMP Requirements | Clarifies purpose of CGMP: ensure quality and prevent adulteration. | β Missing | Foundational requirement omitted | Add an introductory row summarizing CGMP purpose and linking to L0 governance. | L0 Charter | |
| 111.23 β General Sanitation Principles | Requires sanitary handling of materials and prevention of contamination. | β Missing | Misplaced / omitted citation | Add 111.23 under Facilities & Sanitation (Subpart C) or include minimal placeholder under Subpart A. | SOP-SAN-CLEAN / SOP-SAN-MASTER | |
| 111.27 β Some General Equipment Requirements | Portions of 111.27 address general sanitation, cleaning, and equipment standards. | β Partial | Incomplete coverage | Clarify which subsections apply; add missing subsections if applicable. | SOP-PROD-CLEAN / SOP-PKG-CLEAN / SOP-SAN-CLEAN |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.8 β Personnel Illness & Disease Control | Requires personnel with illness, open wounds, infections, or communicable conditions to be excluded from operations that may contaminate product. |
Personnel with illness or open lesions must be excluded from operations where product, components, or contact surfaces may become contaminated. Requires documented illness reporting and supervisor assessment. |
β Partial | Summary too narrow; missing exclusion requirement | Expand summary to include exclusion criteria and reporting obligations. |
SOP-PROD-HYGIENE
AA: Illness log, Personnel exclusion documentation |
| 111.10 β Personnel Hygiene Practices | Requires adequate personal cleanliness, clothing, handwashing, glove use, and removal of jewelry/loose items to prevent contamination. |
Personnel must maintain personal cleanliness, proper gowning, handwashing, and removal of jewelry to prevent contamination of dietary supplements, components, and contact surfaces. |
β Partial | Missing explicit hygiene elements required by CFR | Update summary to include gowning, handwashing, and contamination prevention intent. |
SOP-PROD-HYGIENE
AA: Hygiene training, Hygiene assessment logs |
| 111.12 β Personnel Qualification, Training & Oversight | Requires employees to have necessary education, training, experience, and oversight. Requires documentation of training and evaluation of competency. |
Personnel must be qualified through education, training, or experience; training must be documented; competency must be evaluated; supervisors must oversee and ensure personnel are performing tasks correctly. |
β Partial | Summary too vague; missing documentation and competency elements | Add qualification standards, training documentation, and competency evaluation. |
SOP-TAL-TRAIN, SOP-TAL-COMP, SOP-TAL-QUAL
SOP-QA-IA (oversight) AA: Training records, Competency assessments |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.15 β Sanitary Operations | Requires maintaining the physical plant in a clean and sanitary condition, controlling trash, drainage, sanitizers, cleaning compounds, and preventing contamination from facility conditions. |
Facility must be maintained in a clean, sanitary condition; sanitation chemicals must be controlled; waste and drainage must not contaminate components or product; cleaning procedures and frequencies must prevent cross-contamination. |
β Partial | Overly broad; missing sanitation chemical controls & waste/drainage requirements | Expand summary to include chemical control, drainage, trash, and contamination-prevention elements. |
SOP-SAN-CLEAN, SOP-SAN-MASTER, SOP-MAINT-FACILITY
AA: Sanitation logs, Facility inspections, ATP logs |
| 111.20 β Physical Plant & Grounds | Requires adequate design, construction, pest exclusion, airflow/ventilation control, temperature/humidity control, and facility layout to prevent mixups & contamination. |
Facility must be designed and maintained to prevent contamination, including proper airflow, ventilation, pest exclusion, environmental control, adequate space for segregation, and control of temperature and humidity where applicable. |
β Partial | Missing airflow/ventilation control, pest exclusion, spacing requirements | Expand summary to include airflow control, environmental monitoring, pest exclusion, and spatial layout design. |
SOP-MAINT-FACILITY, SOP-SAN-PEST, SOP-WH-RACKMAP
AA: HVAC logs, Pest control reports, Facility maps |
| 111.23 β General Sanitation Requirements | Requires sanitary handling of materials, controlling cleaning tools, preventing contamination from workers & equipment. |
General sanitation requirements must be implemented to ensure sanitary handling of components and dietary supplements, including control of cleaning tools, handling equipment, and prevention of contamination from workers or facility conditions. |
β Missing | Missing CFR citation | Add 111.23 as a new row under Facilities & Sanitation. |
SOP-SAN-CLEAN, SOP-PROD-HYGIENE, SOP-MH-HANDLING
AA: Sanitation tools control log, Hygiene inspection results |
| 111.27(a) β Cleaning of Contact Surfaces | Requires cleaning & sanitizing of equipment, utensils, and contact surfaces as frequently as necessary to prevent contamination. |
Contact surfaces must be cleaned and sanitized at required frequencies to prevent contamination of components, in-process materials, and finished dietary supplements. |
β Partial | Missing sanitation requirement (not just cleaning) | Add sanitation requirement; differentiate cleaning vs sanitizing. |
SOP-PROD-CLEAN, SOP-PKG-CLEAN, SOP-SAN-CLEAN
AA: Cleaning logs, ATP verification, Pre-op checklists |
| 111.27(b) β Cleaning Frequency | Requires defined cleaning frequencies based on risk and use of master sanitation schedule. |
Cleaning must occur at defined frequencies based on risk, soil load, and operational needs; the master sanitation schedule must be followed and documented. |
β Partial | Missing risk basis & scheduling requirement | Add requirement to define frequency based on risk and operational need. |
SOP-SAN-MASTER
AA: Master Sanitation Schedule, MSS completion logs |
| 111.27(c) β Equipment Construction & Accessibility | Equipment must be designed and maintained so surfaces can be adequately cleaned and inspected. |
Equipment must be constructed, installed, and maintained to allow proper cleaning, inspection, and maintenance to prevent contamination. |
β Missing | CFR requirement missing | Add subsection 111.27(c) regarding equipment design & accessibility for cleaning. |
SOP-MAINT-FACILITY, SOP-PROD-PREOP
AA: Equipment design docs, Maintenance logs |
| 111.27(d) β Equipment Inspection Before Use | Requires inspection of equipment before use to ensure clean, safe, and correctly assembled. |
Equipment must be inspected prior to use to ensure cleanliness, correct assembly, and readiness for production; inspections must be documented. |
β Partial | Missing assembly verification language | Add language for assembly check and documentation requirement. |
SOP-PROD-PREOP
AA: Pre-op inspection form |
| 111.27(e) β Prevention of Contamination from Equipment | Equipment must not contribute contaminants (lubricants, metal fragments, residues). |
Equipment must be designed, maintained, and operated so it does not contribute lubricants, metal, or residues that could contaminate components or dietary supplements. |
β Missing | Critical missing contamination-control requirement | Add subsection 111.27(e) concerning equipment contamination prevention. |
SOP-PROD-FMCONTROL, SOP-MAINT-PM, SOP-MAINT-CAL
AA: Foreign material logs, PM records |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.25 β Equipment & Utensil Requirements | Requires equipment to be designed, installed, cleaned, maintained, and operated to prevent contamination, ensure correct functioning, and allow proper cleaning & inspection. |
Add governing section for equipment design, construction, installation, and maintenance. |
β Missing | Entire CFR section omitted | Add Subpart D header and full 111.25 entry to L0 table. |
SOP-MAINT-FACILITY, SOP-MAINT-PM, SOP-PROD-PREOP
AA: PM logs, Pre-op checks, Maintenance records |
| 111.27 β Equipment Cleaning & Sanitation (see Subpart C redline) | 111.27 requirements appear under Facilities & Sanitation but belong partially in both C & D. |
Correct cross-reference: 111.27(d) & (e) relate to equipment integrity and must be included under Subpart D. |
β Partial | Structural misplacement | Duplicate or cross-reference 111.27(d) & (e) in Subpart D. |
SOP-PROD-PREOP, SOP-PROD-CLEAN, SOP-MAINT-FACILITY
AA: Pre-op forms, Cleaning logs |
| 111.30 β Equipment & Utensil Handling | Requires proper handling, cleaning, storage, and protection of utensils and equipment to prevent contamination and mixups. Includes storage of cleaned equipment. |
Equipment and utensils must be cleaned, handled, and stored in a manner that prevents contamination and ensures they remain in a ready-to-use condition. Clean/dirty status must be controlled. |
β Partial | Missing storage & status control elements | Add cleaned/dirty status control and storage requirements. |
SOP-PROD-PREOP, SOP-WH-STOR, SOP-MH-HANDLING
AA: Equipment status tags, Storage inspection logs |
| 111.35(a) β Calibration Requirements | Requires instruments and controls to be calibrated at appropriate frequencies and intervals to ensure accuracy. |
All measuring, weighing, testing, and monitoring equipment must be calibrated on a schedule with documented results to ensure accuracy. |
β Missing | Critical calibration requirement absent | Add calibration requirement; link to calibration SOP. |
SOP-MAINT-CAL, SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM
AA: Calibration certificates, Calibration logs |
| 111.35(b)(1β4) β Calibration, Inspection & Documentation Requirements | Requires documentation of calibration, immediate action when equipment is out of tolerance, and review of impact on product previously tested or measured. |
Add subsections requiring calibration documentation, investigation of out-of-tolerance equipment, and evaluation of affected product history. |
β Missing | Critical documentation & impact assessment missing | Add full 111.35(b) requirements. |
SOP-MAINT-CAL, SOP-QA-DEV
AA: OOT logs, Calibration deviation investigations |
| 111.35(b)(5) β Electronic Records & Backups | Requires backup of electronic records and protection against loss. |
Electronic records must be backed up to prevent loss; access must be controlled; integrity must be ensured. |
β Partial (AND mislocated) | Belongs under Subpart P, not Equipment | Move this row to βGlobal Documentation & Recordkeeping.β |
SOP-IT-BACKUP, SOP-IT-ACCESS
AA: Backup logs |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.55 β Requirement to Establish Specifications | Requires written specifications for: - Components - In-process controls - Finished products - Labeling - Packaging QC must approve and these must ensure identity, purity, strength, and composition. |
Add: Manufacturers must establish specifications for components, in-process materials, labeling, packaging, and finished products. Specifications must ensure identity, purity, strength, composition, and contaminant control. |
β Missing | Entire CFR section omitted | Add 111.55 as the lead entry for Subpart E. |
SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM, SOP-QCP-SAMPLE, SOP-QCL-TEST
AA: Specification sheets, QC approval records |
| 111.60 β Requirement for Materials to Meet Specifications | Requires verifying materials meet specifications before release for use. QC must approve or reject each lot. |
Add: Components and packaging materials must meet all specifications before release for use; QC must approve acceptance or rejection. |
β Missing | Major compliance requirement missing | Add 111.60 and link to QC review & material status controls. |
SOP-WH-RECV, SOP-QCP-SAMPLE, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Receiving records, Sampling results |
| 111.65 β Quality Control Operations | QC must review and approve: - Specifications - Monitoring & testing results - Deviations - Corrective actions - Batch production records - Release or rejection decisions |
Add: QC must review and approve all specifications, monitoring results, deviations, reprocessing decisions, and final batch release or rejection. |
β Missing | Critical QC governance requirement omitted | Add 111.65 and assign governance to QA SOPs. |
SOP-QA-REL, SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-CAPA, SOP-QA-MGMTREV
AA: BPR review checklist, QC approval signatures |
| 111.70(a) β Component Specifications | Requires identity specification for each component and additional specifications for purity, strength, composition, and contaminants as needed. |
Components must have established identity, purity, strength, and composition specifications. Each lot must be tested for identity before use, and additional specifications must be verified through COA or testing. |
β Partial | Missing purity/strength/composition requirements | Expand summary to include full scope of component specifications. |
SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM, SOP-WH-RECV, SOP-QCL-TEST
AA: COA review, ID test results |
| 111.70(b) β In-Process Specifications | Requires in-process control specifications for each manufacturing stage, including blend times, weights, encapsulation parameters, environmental conditions, and uniformity checks. |
In-process specifications must control blending, encapsulation, weights, uniformity, torque, and other process parameters to ensure consistency and meet MMR requirements. |
β Partial | Incomplete representation of in-process controls | Expand summary to include environmental and equipment parameter controls. |
SOP-PROD-BLEND, SOP-PROD-ENCAP, SOP-PROD-WEIGH, SOP-QCP-IPC
AA: IPC logs, Batch records |
| 111.70(c) β Finished Product Specifications | Requires specifications for identity, purity, strength, composition, and limits on contaminants for finished product. |
Finished product must meet identity, purity, strength, composition, and contaminant specifications before release. |
β Incorrect | Mapped to wrong CFR requirement | Create a separate row for finished product specifications under 111.70(c). |
SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM, SOP-QA-REL
AA: COA, Test reports, BPR results |
| 111.70(d) β Packaging & Label Specifications | Requires specifications for packaging suitability and label accuracy. |
Packaging and labels must meet defined specifications ensuring they protect product quality and accurately reflect product identity. |
β Incorrect | Incorrectly mapped to warehouse status labeling | Add packaging/label specification requirements; move status labeling to correct section (111.455). |
SOP-PKG-LABEL, SOP-PKG-SETUP, SOP-PKG-PACK
AA: Label spec sheets, Packaging approval forms |
| 111.70(e) β Manufacturing Process Controls | Controls must ensure batch meets specifications, including environment, equipment, and operator activities. |
Add: Manufacturing controls must ensure adherence to MMR, environmental control, operator performance, and prevention of contamination. |
β Partial | Missing environmental and contamination-prevention components | Expand description to include environmental & operator controls. |
SOP-PROD-BLEND, SOP-PROD-ENCAP, SOP-PROD-WEIGH, SOP-MH-SEG
AA: Batch records, Environmental logs |
| 111.70(f) β Contamination Prevention | Must prevent contamination, adulteration, mixups, foreign material, and allergen cross-contact. |
Modernize: Must control allergen cross-contact, foreign material, dust migration, and mixups via cleaning, equipment design, segregation, and environmental controls. |
β Partial | Missing FM & allergen program requirements | Expand contamination requirements. |
SOP-PROD-FMCONTROL, SOP-SAN-CLEAN, SOP-MH-SEG
AA: Allergen logs, FM inspection logs |
| 111.70(g) β Reprocessing Requirements | Reprocessing must not adversely affect quality; QC must approve all reprocessing decisions. |
Add: Reprocessing may only occur with documented evaluation showing identity, purity, strength, and composition remain unaffected; QC must approve. |
β Missing | CFR subsection omitted | Add full reprocessing requirement. |
SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Reprocessing approval records |
| 111.75(a) β Component Identity Testing | Every lot of every component must undergo identity testing before use. |
Clarify: Identity testing must be performed on each component lot; no exceptions unless FDA grants one. |
β Partial | Missing scope and regulatory minimums | Clarify scientific identity testing standards. |
SOP-QCL-TEST, SOP-QCP-SAMPLE
AA: FTIR results, COA verification |
| 111.75(c) β In-Process Testing Requirements | In-process materials must meet specifications at each stage of production. |
Strengthen to: IPC testing must verify blend uniformity, fill weight, torque, environmental parameters, and MMR-defined critical process controls. |
β Partial | Underrepresented IPC scope | Expand IPC definition. |
SOP-QCP-IPC, SOP-PROD-BLEND, SOP-PROD-ENCAP
AA: IPC logs |
| 111.75(h) β Material Deviations & OOS Handling | Requires documented OOS investigations, material deviations assessments, CAPA, and QC review. |
Add: Requires deviation triage, root cause evaluation, CAPA linkage, and QC approval. |
β Partial | Missing CAPA & root-cause rigor | Expand to include full OOS/OOT and deviation requirements. |
SOP-QCL-DATA, SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-CAPA
AA: OOS reports, CAPA records |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.103 β QC Responsibilities | QC must perform quality oversight for manufacturing, packaging, labeling, testing, and holding operations to ensure product quality and compliance. QC must verify deviations are investigated and ensure CAPA is implemented. |
Add: QC oversees all GMP operations, ensuring materials, processes, deviations, and testing comply with established specifications and regulatory requirements. |
β Missing | Critical regulatory requirement omitted | Add governing QC oversight requirement (111.103) to L0 Section 2A. |
SOP-QA-REL, SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-CAPA, SOP-QCP-SAMPLE
AA: QC oversight logs, Deviation reports |
| 111.105 β QC Review & Approval | QC must approve or reject: - Specifications - Testing results - Monitoring records - Deviations - Corrective actions - Reprocessing - Batch production records QC must ensure final disposition is appropriate. |
Add: QC must review and approve all GMP documents affecting product quality, including specifications, IPC data, test results, deviations, CAPA, and BPRs. |
β Missing | Major governance omission | Add Section 111.105 detailing QC approval authority. |
SOP-QA-REL, SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-CAPA, SOP-QCL-DATA
AA: QC release signatures, Document approval forms |
| 111.110 β QC Material Review & Disposition | Requires QC evaluation and approval of any material review or disposition decision. Rejected materials must be identified and prevented from unintended use. |
Add: QC must review material quality issues and approve disposition decisions, including quarantine, rejection, rework, or destruction. |
β Missing | MRB governance missing | Add Section 111.110 to L0; reference MRB programs. |
SOP-QA-NCMR, SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-REL
AA: NCMR/MRB forms |
| 111.113 β QC Review of Manufacturing Deviations | QC must review deviations to determine their impact on product quality, approve investigations, and ensure corrective actions are implemented. |
Update: QC must review all deviations, determine product impact, approve investigations, and ensure CAPA is effective. |
β Partial | Missing QC decision-making and CAPA linkage | Expand deviation language to reflect QC responsibility. |
SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-CAPA
AA: Deviation forms, CAPA records |
| 111.117 β QC Review of Laboratory Operations | QC must review and approve all testing results and ensure methods are appropriate. QC must review OOS results. |
QC must review and approve laboratory test results, sampling results, and OOS investigations from both internal and third-party labs. |
β Partial | Missing QC method suitability review & OOS authority | Clarify that QCβnot the labβhas final approval authority for test results and OOS closure. |
SOP-QCL-TEST, SOP-QCL-DATA
AA: Test reports, OOS investigation records |
| 111.120 β QC Review of Packaging & Labeling Operations | QC must verify packaging line setup, correct label usage, and reconciliation of labels before product release. |
QC must verify label version, reconciliation, packaging line setup, and correct application of labels before approving batch release. |
β Partial | Missing QC verification of reconciliation | Expand summary to explicitly include label reconciliation & QC verification. |
SOP-PKG-LABEL, SOP-PKG-PACK, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Label reconciliation logs |
| 111.123 β QC Review of Returned Product Decisions | QC must assess returned product to determine if salvageable, requiring evaluation of quality, safety, and compliance. |
Add: QC must determine disposition of returned products and ensure they are not redistributed unless quality is fully verified. |
β Partial | Missing QC disposition requirements | Add full QC disposition authority. |
SOP-QA-RETURNS
AA: Returned product evaluation forms |
| 111.127 β QC Release for Distribution | QC must approve release only after verifying BPR completeness, test results, deviations, and labeling operations. |
QC must review the BPR, verify all specifications are met, and approve batch release. |
β Incorrect | Mapped to wrong requirement | Create a dedicated 111.127 row for QC release authority. |
SOP-QA-REL
AA: Batch release signatures |
| 111.135 β QC Rejection of Product | QC must reject any batch or material that fails to meet specifications or GMP requirements, and must control rejected goods. |
Add: QC must reject nonconforming components, in-process materials, or finished goods and ensure they are quarantined and prevented from unintended use. |
β Partial | Missing QC rejection authority | Separate QC rejection from MRB review; add dedicated rejection language. |
SOP-QA-NCMR, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Rejection tags, Disposition records |
| 111.140 β QC Documentation Requirements | QC must maintain documentation of: - Approvals and rejections - Investigations - Reviews of monitoring, testing, deviations - Release and disposition decisions |
QC must document all actions including approvals, rejections, investigations, test reviews, deviations, and final release decisions. |
β Partial | Vague summary; missing QC-specific documentation scope | Make documentation requirement QC-specific. |
SOP-QA-DC, SOP-QA-REL, SOP-QA-DEV
AA: QC documentation logs |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.153 β Approval of Packaging and Labels Before Use | QC must approve all packaging and label specifications before use, ensuring correct material, suitability, and regulatory compliance. Must include version and revision control. |
QC must approve all packaging and label specifications prior to use, including materials, accuracy, and version control. |
β Partial | Missing QC approval and version control requirements | Add QC approval and version control language. |
SOP-PROC-DOCS, SOP-PKG-LABEL, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Spec approval records, Label master files |
| 111.155 β Requirements for Receiving Components, Packaging & Labels | Requires documentation and verification of: - Supplier identity - Shipping container integrity - Tamper condition - Labeling accuracy - Quantity verification |
Receiving must verify shipping integrity, supplier information, identification, label accuracy, and documentation for each lot received. |
β Partial | Missing supplier verification link and shipping container integrity | Expand receiving controls to include all CFR-required checks. |
SOP-WH-RECV, SOP-PROC-ASL, SOP-PROC-QUAL
AA: Receiving logs, Inspection forms |
| 111.160 β Quarantine of Received Components | Received materials must be quarantined until sampling, testing, and QC disposition. Must prevent use before approval. |
All received components must be placed in controlled quarantine with clear status labeling until QC approves them for release. |
β Partial | Mapped incorrectly to Subpart L section | Move this requirement to Subpart G and detail quarantine controls. |
SOP-WH-STOR, SOP-WH-RECV, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Status tags, Quarantine log |
| 111.165 β Testing of Components, Packaging, Labels | Components must be tested for identity and verified for other specs; packaging and labels must meet specifications. |
Identity testing is required for each component lot; packaging and labels must meet approved specifications prior to release. |
β Partial | Missing packaging/label verification requirements | Expand test requirements to include packaging/label specifications. |
SOP-QCL-TEST, SOP-PKG-LABEL
AA: ID test results, COA verification |
| 111.170 β Requirements for Handling and Storage | Must protect components, packaging, and labels from contamination, deterioration, mixups, and environmental exposure. |
Components, packaging, and labels must be handled and stored to prevent mixups, contamination, deterioration, and environmental damage. |
β Partial | Missing specific environmental hazards + mixup prevention | Add controls for mixup prevention and environment protection. |
SOP-WH-STOR, SOP-WH-INVT, SOP-MH-HANDLING
AA: Storage logs, Temperature/humidity logs |
| 111.175 β Labeling Controls & Reconciliation | Requires reconciliation of labels issued vs applied, proper control of label inventory, and prevention of mislabeling. |
Labels must be reconciled, controlled for quantity and version, and verified prior to release. |
β Partial | Missing reconciliation thresholds and mislabeling prevention | Add reconciliation procedures + mislabeling controls. |
SOP-PKG-LABEL, SOP-PKG-PACK, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Label reconciliation logs |
| 111.180 β Documentation Requirements for Components, Packaging & Labels | Requires complete records of receipt, testing, QC disposition, and use of components, packaging, and labels. |
Must maintain complete records for receipt, quarantine, testing, approval, and use of components, packaging, and labels. |
β Partial | Missing linkage to QC and receiving records | Strengthen documentation requirements. |
SOP-QA-DC, SOP-WH-RECV, SOP-PROC-DOCS
AA: Receiving logs, QC disposition records |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.205 β Requirements for Manufacturing Steps & Written Instructions | Requires written instructions for all manufacturing steps, including: (a) Component addition steps (b) Control points and parameters (c) Environmental control requirements (d) Equipment used (e) Calibrations, monitoring, and corrective actions Requires consistency with the Master Manufacturing Record (MMR). |
Manufacturing steps must follow written instructions defining component addition, equipment, environmental controls, critical parameters, monitoring, and corrective actions as required by the MMR. |
β Partial | Missing subsections (aβe), incomplete interpretation | Add full breakdown of required written manufacturing instructions. |
SOP-PROD-BLEND, SOP-PROD-WEIGH, SOP-PROD-ENCAP
AA: BPR controlled copies, Monitoring logs, Parameter checks |
| 111.210 β Master Manufacturing Record (MMR) Content Requirements | Requires inclusion of **ALL** of the following in the MMR: 1. Product name & strength 2. List of components 3. Ingredient weights/measures 4. Theoretical yields & permissible variation 5. Specifications 6. Controlled manufacturing instructions 7. Environmental requirements 8. Equipment & utensils 9. Packaging & labeling instructions 10. Sampling & testing procedures 11. In-process control instructions 12. Special notations 13. BPR linkage 14. Documentation requirements 15. Corrective actions |
MMR must contain complete product formulation, theoretical yield, specifications, detailed step-by-step instructions, environmental and equipment requirements, packaging/labeling instructions, sampling/testing requirements, IPC instructions, and documentation requirements. |
β Partial | Missing explicit CFR-required elements (list of 15) | Add explicit breakdown of MMR elements (111.210(b)(1)-(15)). |
SOP-PROD-MMR, SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM
AA: Approved MMR, Revision control logs |
| 111.210(a) β MMR Must Ensure Consistency & Quality | Requires MMR to ensure each batch is manufactured consistently and meets identity, purity, strength, and composition requirements. |
MMR must ensure consistent manufacturing and compliance with identity, purity, strength, and composition specifications for every batch. |
β Missing | Foundational MMR requirement absent | Add 111.210(a) as a separate requirement. |
SOP-PROD-MMR, SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM
AA: Approved MMR with revision approval signatures |
| 111.210(b)(1)β(15) β Detailed Required Elements of the MMR | Requires explicit inclusion of Item 1 through 15: Composition, weights, equipment, yields, specifications, environmental controls, IPC tests, sampling, corrective actions, labeling instructions, and documentation. |
Add explicit reference to the 15 mandatory MMR elements defined in 111.210(b). |
β Missing | Not broken out; compliance risk | Break out or explicitly reference all 15 MMR elements. |
SOP-PROD-MMR, SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM
AA: MMR element checklist, QA review record |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.255 β Requirement to Prepare a BPR for Each Batch | Requires preparing a unique BPR for each batch, consistent with the MMR, including: - Documentation of each manufacturing step - Actual values vs theoretical - Equipment ID - Personnel ID - Component lot numbers - Verification steps |
A BPR must be prepared for each batch following the MMR and must document all manufacturing steps, equipment and personnel IDs, component lots, actual values vs theoretical yields, and verification activities. |
β Partial | Missing detailed CFR elements | Expand BPR description to reflect full 111.255(a)(1)-(4) requirements. |
SOP-PROD-BATCH, SOP-PROD-BLEND, SOP-PROD-WEIGH
AA: Completed BPR, Batch packet |
| 111.260 β Required BPR Elements (AβT) | Requires the BPR to document: (a) Product name (b) Batch number (c) All component lots & weights (d) Equipment IDs (e) Manufacturing instructions (f) Sampling procedures (g) Test results (h) In-process controls (i) Yield calculations (j) Label reconciliation (k) Packaging/labeling details (l) Personnel signatures (mβt) Additional detailed recordkeeping elements |
BPR must contain all required elements (111.260(a)β(t)), including manufacturing steps, component lots, weights, equipment IDs, IPC results, sampling/testing results, yield, labeling details, and operator/QC signatures. |
β Partial | Missing explicit breakdown of (a)β(t) | Add explicit reference to the full required list or add them as enumerated sub-items. |
SOP-PROD-BATCH, SOP-QCP-IPC, SOP-PKG-PACK
AA: Batch packet, IPC logs, Label reconciliation log |
| 111.265 β QC Review and Approval of BPR | QC must review the entire BPR, ensure all specifications were met, all deviations addressed, and ensure documentation completeness before release. |
QC must review the completed BPR for completeness, specification conformance, deviation resolution, and approve or reject the batch. |
β Missing | Critical QC authority missing | Add QC review & approval requirement for BPR. |
SOP-QA-REL
AA: BPR review checklist, QC approval signatures |
| 111.270 β Documentation of Manufacturing Steps | Requires documentation of each step as it occurs, including: - Dates & times - Personnel performing the step - Actual results - Cross-checks and verifications |
BPR must document each manufacturing step at the time of performance, including date/time, personnel, actual results, and verification signatures. |
β Missing | Required CFR subsection absent | Add real-time documentation requirements. |
SOP-PROD-BATCH, SOP-QA-DC
AA: Timestamped BPR entries, Operator signatures |
| 111.275 β Batch Traceability Requirements | Requires traceable linkage between BPR, MMR, component lots, packaging records, and QC disposition. Must allow tracking from finished goods back to all materials. |
BPR must maintain complete traceability to the MMR, component lots, packaging/labeling records, QC release, and test results. |
β Missing | Critical traceability requirement omitted | Add linkage & traceability requirements to L0. |
SOP-WH-INVT, SOP-PROD-BATCH, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Lot traceability logs |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.303 β Laboratory Responsibilities | Requires laboratories (internal or external) to be qualified, independent, and capable of generating valid test data. Must control environment, sample handling, and prevent contamination or mixups. |
Add: Laboratories performing testing must be qualified and controlled to ensure accuracy, prevent mixups, and maintain sample integrity and environmental suitability. |
β Missing | Foundational laboratory requirement absent | Add 111.303 as governing laboratory responsibility requirement. |
SOP-QCL-TEST, SOP-QCL-DATA, SOP-QA-DEV
AA: Lab qualification files, Chain-of-custody logs |
| 111.310 β Laboratory Equipment Requirements | Requires calibration, verification, suitability testing, maintenance, documentation control, and appropriate handling of lab instruments and equipment. |
Add: Lab equipment must be qualified, calibrated, verified for suitability, and maintained to ensure valid, accurate analytical results. |
β Missing | Critical lab instrumentation controls missing | Add 111.310 entry; cross-reference calibration & maintenance SOPs. |
SOP-MAINT-CAL, SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM, SOP-QCL-TEST
AA: Calibration logs, Suitability checks |
| 111.315 β Laboratory Control System | Requires a laboratory control system that ensures the validity, reliability, and accuracy of test results. Must include written methods, sample handling procedures, and documentation requirements. |
Laboratory must maintain a validated control system including written methods, sampling plans, environmental controls, analyst qualification, and documentation ensuring accuracy and reliability of test results. |
β Partial | Missing method control requirements, sample handling controls, analyst qualification | Expand description to include method control, analyst qualification, and sample integrity controls. |
SOP-QCL-TEST, SOP-QCP-SAMPLE
AA: Method sheets, Sample custody logs, Training files |
| 111.320 β Laboratory Operations | Requires execution of testing using scientifically valid methods, proper sampling techniques, contamination prevention, and accurate data recording. |
Laboratory must conduct testing using validated or verified scientific methods, proper sampling and preparation techniques, contamination controls, and complete, accurate documentation. |
β Partial | Missing validated/verified methods and scientific basis | Add explicit requirement for validated methods and sampling controls. |
SOP-QCL-TEST, SOP-QCP-SAMPLE
AA: Sample prep logs, Method validation files |
| 111.325 β Testing Requirements | Requires testing to determine whether specifications are met for: - Components - In-process materials - Finished dietary supplements Must include identity, purity, strength, composition, and contamination limits. |
Testing must verify component, in-process, and finished-product specifications for identity, purity, strength, composition, and contaminants using scientifically valid methods. |
β Partial | Missing multiple required specification types (strength, composition, contaminants) | Expand to full CFR scope for all specification categories. |
SOP-QCL-TEST, SOP-QCL-DATA
AA: Test reports, Lab notebooks |
| 111.330 β Documentation & Review of Laboratory Results | Requires complete documentation of laboratory data, sample preparation, method conditions, instrument parameters, calculations, and results. QC must review for completeness, accuracy, and scientific validity. |
All analytical data, calculations, instrument conditions, and results must be documented and reviewed by QC for accuracy and scientific validity. |
β Missing | Major review requirement missing | Add documentation + QC review requirement for lab data. |
SOP-QCL-DATA, SOP-QA-REL
AA: QC-reviewed lab data packages |
| 111.335 β QC Final Approval of Laboratory Testing | QC must approve or reject testing results and ensure the labβs findings support product release decisions and deviation/OOS processing. |
QC must approve or reject laboratory results, ensure OOS/OOT investigations are completed, and verify test data supports final disposition decisions. |
β Missing | Final QC authority absent | Add QC approval requirement for test results. |
SOP-QCL-DATA, SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-REL
AA: QC approval signatures, OOS reports |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.403 β Packaging Suitability | Packaging must be suitable for intended use, protect the product, and not interact chemically or physically in a way that affects quality. Must prevent contamination and deterioration. |
Packaging materials must be suitable, protect product quality, and not cause contamination or deterioration. |
β Missing | Foundational packaging requirement omitted | Add 111.403 entry and ensure full suitability assessment is captured. |
SOP-PKG-PACK, SOP-PROC-DOCS
AA: Packaging spec sheets, Suitability assessments |
| 111.407 β Control of Packaging & Label Components | Packaging components must be received, handled, stored, and controlled to prevent contamination or mixups. Must have controlled access and segregated storage. |
Packaging and label components must be controlled, stored, and handled to prevent mixups and contamination. |
β Missing | Critical mixup-prevention requirement missing | Add component handling & storage controls for packaging/labels. |
SOP-WH-STOR, SOP-PKG-LABEL
AA: Packaging component logs, Storage inspection logs |
| 111.410 β Label Control System | Requires: - Label issuance system - Version control - Segregation of obsolete labels - Label reconciliation - Prevention of mislabeling |
Label issuance, version control, reconciliation, and segregation of obsolete labels are required to prevent mislabeling. |
β Partial | Missing reconciliation & obsolete label controls | Add version control, reconciliation, and obsolete label segregation explicitly. |
SOP-PKG-LABEL, SOP-PKG-PACK
AA: Label issuance log, Label reconciliation log |
| 111.415 β Packaging & Labeling Operations | Requires controlled operations, including: - Line clearance - Cleanliness verification - Equipment setup verification - Prevention of mixups - Packaging parameter control |
Packaging operations must include documented line clearance, cleanliness checks, equipment setup verification, and controls to prevent mixups. |
β Partial | Missing line clearance, set-up verification & mixup prevention | Expand summary to include all CFR-required controls. |
SOP-PKG-SETUP, SOP-PKG-PACK, SOP-PKG-CLEAN
AA: Line clearance log, Packaging batch record |
| 111.420 β Requirements for Filling, Assembling & Packaging Operations | Must control: - Fill weights - Torque / seal integrity - Count accuracy - Environmental conditions - Equipment cleaning & status |
Filling, assembling, and packaging must control fill weights, closure integrity, count accuracy, and environmental conditions. |
β Missing | Major packaging requirement missing | Add 111.420 with full packaging operation requirements. |
SOP-PKG-PACK, SOP-QCP-IPC
AA: IPC logs (counts, torque), Packaging batch record |
| 111.425 β Packaging Line Verification | Must verify packaging lines: - Correct labels - Correct components - Correct packaging materials - Cleanliness and clearance Before beginning operations. |
Packaging lines must be verified for correct materials, labels, cleanliness, and clearance before use. |
β Missing | Line verification requirement absent | Add 111.425 and link to setup/line clearance processes. |
SOP-PKG-SETUP, SOP-PKG-LABEL
AA: Line verification log |
| 111.430 β Labeling Check Requirements | Must check and document: - Correct label applied - Correct lot/batch number - Count/quantity accuracy - No mixed labels - Label legibility - Label adhesion/integrity |
Labels must be verified for correctness, lot/batch coding accuracy, count/quantity match, and absence of mixed or incorrect labels. |
β Partial | Missing full CFR list of labeling checks | Add detail: legibility, adhesion, correct version, batch coding. |
SOP-PKG-LABEL, SOP-PKG-PACK
AA: Label verification log |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.453 β Holding of Dietary Supplements | Must hold finished goods under appropriate conditions to prevent deterioration, contamination, or mixups. Must control temperature, humidity (if applicable), storage arrangement, and segregation of lots. |
Finished dietary supplements must be held under appropriate conditions to prevent deterioration, contamination, or mixups, with controlled storage and segregation. |
β Missing | Foundational warehouse holding requirement omitted | Add 111.453 to Subpart L and include environmental & segregation controls. |
SOP-WH-STOR, SOP-WH-INVT
AA: Storage logs, Temp/RH logs, Segregation maps |
| 111.455 β Status Identification of Dietary Supplements | Must identify product status (approved, rejected, quarantined, returned) during holding to prevent mixups. Must ensure no unapproved product is shipped. |
Status of materials and finished goods must be clearly identified (quarantine, approved, rejected, returned) to prevent mixups and unintended use or shipment. |
β Partial | Misfiled + missing detailed requirements | Move 111.455 into Subpart L and expand status-control requirements. |
SOP-WH-STOR, SOP-WH-SHIP, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Status tags, Inventory log, Release forms |
| 111.460 β Distribution Procedures | Requires procedures ensuring: - Correct product shipped - Correct quantity - Correct labeling & documentation - Prevention of mixups during loading - Secure transportation conditions |
Distribution operations must ensure correct product, quantity, labeling, and documentation, and prevent mixups during staging and shipment. |
β Missing | Critical warehouse/distribution control missing | Add 111.460 and align to WH shipping & distribution SOPs. |
SOP-WH-SHIP, SOP-WH-TRANS
AA: Shipping logs, Bill of lading, Lot verification forms |
| 111.465 β Control of Returned Dietary Supplements | Returned products must be identified, quarantined, evaluated, and investigated prior to any decision to reintroduce, salvage, or destroy. |
Returned dietary supplements must be identified, quarantined, evaluated for quality, and disposition must be determined by QC. |
β Partial | Missing QC disposition requirement | Expand requirement to explicitly include QC evaluation & approval. |
SOP-QA-RETURNS
AA: Return log, Evaluation forms |
| 111.470 β Salvaging or Reprocessing Returned Goods | Salvage or reprocessing must be scientifically justified, documented, evaluated for quality impact, and approved by QC. Products must not be reintroduced unless meeting full specs. |
Salvage or reprocessing may only occur with documented justification and QC approval confirming the product meets all specifications. |
β Partial | Missing documentation, justification, QC approval language | Expand salvage requirements to include justification, testing, QC approval. |
SOP-QA-RETURNS, SOP-QA-REL
AA: Salvage logs, Reprocessing evaluation |
| 111.475 β Documentation Requirements for Returned/Savaged Product | Requires documentation of: - Returned product details - Evaluation - Investigation - Disposition - Salvage/rework decisions |
Returned product documentation must include original complaint/return info, evaluation, investigation, decision, and QC disposition. |
β Missing | Critical recordkeeping requirement missing | Add 111.475 to L0 mapping. |
SOP-QA-RETURNS, SOP-QA-DEV
AA: Returned goods documentation packet |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.503 β Returned Product Handling | Returned dietary supplements must be: - Identified and quarantined - Evaluated for potential adulteration/mislabeling - Investigated for cause - Disposition approved by QC |
Returned product must be quarantined, evaluated for adulteration, and disposition must be determined and approved by QC, including required investigations. |
β Partial | Missing adulteration evaluation & QC approval | Expand requirement to include QC evaluation + investigation requirements. |
SOP-QA-RETURNS
AA: Return log, Evaluation form, QC disposition approval |
| 111.510 β Returned Product Investigation Requirements | A returned product must be investigated if there is any reasonable possibility of adulteration, misbranding, or manufacturing error. Investigation results must inform CAPA or complaint analysis. |
Returned product must be investigated whenever adulteration or manufacturing error is suspected; results must feed into CAPA or complaint review. |
β Missing | Investigation requirement omitted | Add 111.510 entry to L0. |
SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-RETURNS
AA: Investigation reports |
| 111.515 β Testing of Returned Products | Testing must be performed, as necessary, to determine product quality and disposition. Testing must be documented and scientifically justified. |
Returned product must undergo testing, as necessary, to confirm identity, purity, strength, composition, and absence of contamination before any salvage or reintroduction. |
β Missing | Testing requirement missing | Add testing requirement for returned products. |
SOP-QCL-TEST, SOP-QA-RETURNS
AA: Test reports |
| 111.520 β QC Review of Returned Product Records | QC must review all returned product evaluations, investigations, and testing before disposition. Must ensure trend analysis and link to complaint system. |
QC must review all returned product evaluations, investigations, and testing and approve final disposition. |
β Missing | QC authority requirement absent | Add 111.520 QC review & approval requirement. |
SOP-QA-RETURNS, SOP-QA-REL
AA: QC approval signatures, Review logs |
| 111.535 β Material Review & Disposition | Requires formal MRB (Material Review) procedures including: - Evaluation of nonconforming materials - Investigation of root cause - Impact assessment - QC approval of disposition (reprocess, reject, destroy, use-as-is with justification) |
Nonconforming materials must undergo evaluation, root cause analysis, impact assessment, and QC-approved disposition, documented through MRB. |
β Partial | Missing impact assessment & root cause | Add investigation and QC approval requirements explicitly. |
SOP-QA-NCMR, SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-CAPA
AA: MRB forms, CAPA records |
| 111.560 β Consumer Complaint Handling | Requires a complaint system that ensures: - Documentation of complaint details - Health hazard evaluation - Investigation as necessary - Determination if complaint involves adulteration or manufacturing deficiencies - QC review & approval - Trending of complaints |
Complaints must be documented, evaluated for health risk, investigated when necessary, reviewed by QC, and trended for signals of quality issues. |
β Partial | Missing health hazard evaluation & trend analysis | Add medical/health impact evaluation + trending requirements. |
SOP-QA-COMPLAINT, SOP-QA-DEV
AA: Complaint log, Complaint investigation files |
| 111.570 β Salvage & Reprocessing | Salvage must be performed only when: - Scientifically justified - Evaluated for safety & quality impact - Testing confirms suitability - QC approves reprocessing Reprocessing instructions must be documented. |
Salvage or reprocessing must be scientifically justified, documented, evaluated for impact, tested if necessary, and approved by QC before release. |
β Partial | Missing scientific justification & testing requirements | Add justification, testing, and QC approval details. |
SOP-QA-RETURNS, SOP-QA-REL, SOP-PROD-BATCH
AA: Reprocessing evaluation, QC approval logs |
| CFR Section | CFR Requirement (Authoritative) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111.605 β General Recordkeeping Requirements | All records must be: - Accurate - Legible - Indelible - Created contemporaneously - Stored to prevent deterioration Must be true copies (original or exact reproduction). |
Records must be accurate, legible, indelible, contemporaneous, and maintained to prevent loss, deterioration, or unauthorized changes. |
β Partial | Missing ALCOA+, contemporaneous requirement, indelibility | Expand summary to meet full CFR text. |
SOP-QA-DC
AA: All controlled records |
| 111.610 β Requirements for Record Content & Format | Records must include: - Date of record creation - Signature/initials of person performing activity - Information required for traceability - True & accurate representation of activity performed Must be promptly available. |
Documentation must accurately represent activities performed, include date/time and signatures/initials, and ensure traceability to responsible personnel. |
β Partial | Missing traceability, true-copy requirement | Include explicit traceability, signature, and data integrity requirements. |
SOP-QA-DC
AA: All controlled documents |
| 111.35(b)(5) β Electronic Records & Backups (Reclassified) | Requires electronic systems to: - Maintain record integrity - Protect against loss - Use secure backups - Control access |
Electronic systems must ensure data integrity, secure access, backup functionality, and protection from loss. |
β Misfiled | Incorrect location (Subpart D) | Move this requirement to Subpart N and expand summary. |
SOP-IT-ACCESS, SOP-IT-BACKUP, SOP-IT-ESIG
AA: Backup logs, Access control logs |
| 111.615 β Retention Period | Records must be retained for at least: - 1 year after expiration date OR - 2 years after distribution of the last batch whichever is later. |
Records must be retained for β₯1 year beyond expiration or β₯2 years after distribution of the last batch, whichever is later. |
β Missing | Retention requirement missing | Add explicit retention rules. |
SOP-QA-DC
AA: Record retention log |
| 111.620 β Records Must Be Readily Available | Records must be accessible during retention period for: - FDA inspection - Internal QA review - Audits |
Records must be readily accessible for FDA inspection, internal QA review, and external audits. |
β Missing | Availability requirement omitted | Add accessibility requirement. |
SOP-QA-DC
AA: Document retrieval logs |
| 111.625 β Records Must Be Available to FDA | Must provide FDA with complete, accurate, and readily retrievable records upon request. Includes electronic and off-site records. |
Records must be promptly available to FDA upon request, including off-site and electronic records. |
β Missing | FDA access requirement absent | Add 111.625 requirement explicitly. |
SOP-QA-DC
AA: Retrieval logs, FDA request logs |
| Regulatory Basis | Requirement Summary (Authoritative Interpretation) | L0 Current Text (with Inline Redline) | Status | Issue Type | Required Correction | Recommended SOP / Evidence Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 CFR 111.560 (Complaint Investigations) β Recall Trigger | Complaints must be evaluated for potential health hazards. If risk to consumer health exists β internal escalation to Recall Committee required. Must determine if recall is necessary based on FDA 21 CFR Part 7 criteria. |
L0 must include escalation criteria when a complaint or investigation identifies a potential health hazard requiring evaluation for recall. |
β Missing | No linkage from complaint system to recall action | Add hazard-based escalation criteria and recall decision logic. |
SOP-QA-COMPLAINT, SOP-QA-DEV, SOP-QA-RECALL
AA: Complaint log, Health hazard evaluation, Recall trigger checklist |
| 21 CFR 111.503 / 111.510 / 111.535 β Returned Product Recall Trigger | Returned product evaluations must determine whether product defects represent a broader safety or quality failure requiring recall or field action. |
Returned product investigations must include evaluation for systemic issues that may trigger recall. |
β Missing | Returned goods not tied to recall risk | Add explicit requirement to evaluate returned goods for potential recall. |
SOP-QA-RETURNS, SOP-QA-RECALL
AA: Returned goods assessment, QC disposition rationale |
| 21 CFR 111.560 + 21 CFR 7.41 β Health Hazard Evaluation | Must perform formal Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) for: - Complaints suggesting injury - Product contamination - Labeling errors - Misbranding - Any adulteration affecting consumer health |
A Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) must be performed when complaints or investigations indicate potential harm to consumers. |
β Missing | HHE absent, major audit vulnerability | Add HHE requirements aligned to 21 CFR Part 7. |
SOP-QA-RECALL, SOP-QA-COMPLAINT
AA: HHE form, medical assessment log |
| 21 CFR Part 7.3(g) β Recall Classification | Must determine whether issue represents: - Class I Recall (serious health risk) - Class II Recall (temporary or reversible health issue) - Class III Recall (unlikely health consequence) |
Recall classification must follow FDA Class IβIII definitions. |
β Missing | No recall classification system defined | Add recall class definitions and decision tree. |
SOP-QA-RECALL
AA: Recall classification worksheet |
| 21 CFR Part 7 Subpart C β Recall Procedures | Recall procedures must describe: - Roles & responsibilities (Recall Coordinator, QA, Regulatory) - Notification content - Depth of recall (consumer, retail, wholesale) - Effectiveness checks - Reporting to FDA as required |
Recall execution steps must include notifications, effectiveness checks, depth determination, and required FDA communications. |
β Missing | No procedural description of recall execution | Add recall procedure logic consistent with FDA 21 CFR 7. |
SOP-QA-RECALL
AA: Recall initiation packet, Effectiveness check records |
| 21 CFR 111.610 + 21 CFR 7.53 β Recall Documentation | Must maintain recall documentation including: - Reason for recall - HHE - Distribution list - Notification records - Response tracking - Effectiveness check results - Final recall report |
Recall documentation must include initiation records, HHE, notifications, response tracking, and final recall report. |
β Missing | Recordkeeping obligations absent | Add full recall documentation requirements. |
SOP-QA-RECALL
AA: Recall record archive |
| 21 CFR 111.535 + Part 7 β CAPA Integration | Root cause investigation and corrective/preventive actions must follow any recall or near-recall event. |
Recalls and potential recalls must trigger deviation and CAPA processes. |
β Missing | No link between recall and CAPA | Add requirement that recalls feed into CAPA/NCMR program. |
SOP-QA-CAPA, SOP-QA-DEV
AA: CAPA reports, Investigation findings |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.8 | 111.8 β Illness & Disease Control | Personnel with illness, infections, or open lesions must be excluded from operations where contamination is possible. | SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP |
Illness reporting logs Personnel exclusion records |
| R-111.10 | 111.10 β Personnel Hygiene Practices | Requires proper hygiene practices including handwashing, protective clothing, cleanliness, and prevention of contamination. | SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP |
Hygiene training records Hygiene inspection logs |
| R-111.12 | 111.12 β Personnel Qualifications | Personnel must have the education, training, or experience to perform assigned duties related to CGMP activities. | SOP-TAL-TRAIN SOP-TAL-COMP SOP-TAL-QUAL SOP-QA-IA SOP-QA-MGMTREV |
Training records Qualification files Competency assessments |
| R-111.14 | 111.14 β Supervisor Responsibilities | Supervisors must ensure compliance with CGMPs and verify personnel perform operations correctly and safely. | SOP-TAL-QUAL SOP-QA-IA SOP-QA-MGMTREV |
Supervisor verifications Training oversight logs |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.8 | 111.8 β Illness & Disease Control | Personnel with illness, infections, or open lesions must be excluded from operations where contamination is possible. | SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP |
Illness reporting logs Personnel exclusion records |
| R-111.10 | 111.10 β Personnel Hygiene Practices | Requires proper hygiene practices including handwashing, protective clothing, cleanliness, and prevention of contamination. | SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP |
Hygiene training records Hygiene inspection logs |
| R-111.12 | 111.12 β Personnel Qualifications | Personnel must have the education, training, or experience to perform assigned duties related to CGMP activities. | SOP-TAL-TRAIN SOP-TAL-COMP SOP-TAL-QUAL SOP-QA-IA SOP-QA-MGMTREV |
Training records Qualification files Competency assessments |
| R-111.14 | 111.14 β Supervisor Responsibilities | Supervisors must ensure compliance with CGMPs and verify personnel perform operations correctly and safely. | SOP-TAL-QUAL SOP-QA-IA SOP-QA-MGMTREV |
Supervisor verifications Training oversight logs |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.15 | 111.15 β Sanitary Operations | Facility must be maintained in a clean, sanitary condition to prevent contamination of components, in-process materials, and finished products. | SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-MAINT-FACILITY |
Sanitation logs Environmental cleaning records Facility inspection reports |
| R-111.20 | 111.20 β Facility Design & Construction | Facilities must be designed and constructed to ensure sanitary operations, efficient cleaning, and prevention of contamination or mixups. | SOP-MAINT-FACILITY SOP-SAN-MASTER |
Facility maps Environmental control logs Design review documents |
| R-111.27(a) | 111.27(a) β Cleaning of Contact Surfaces | All food-contact surfaces must be cleaned and sanitized as necessary to prevent contamination and cross-contact. | SOP-PROD-CLEAN SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-PKG-CLEAN |
Cleaning logs ATP results Sanitation verification records |
| R-111.27(b) | 111.27(b) β Cleaning Frequency | Cleaning must occur at appropriate frequencies to maintain sanitary conditions and prevent buildup of contaminants. | SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-PROD-CLEAN SOP-PKG-CLEAN |
Master sanitation schedule Cleaning frequency records |
| R-111.27(d) | 111.27(d) β Equipment Inspection Before Use | Equipment and utensils must be inspected immediately before use to ensure cleanliness and proper function. | SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PKG-SETUP |
Pre-op inspection checklists Line clearance records |
| R-111.30 | 111.30 β Equipment & Utensil Handling | Equipment and utensils must be designed, constructed, and maintained to avoid contamination and allow proper cleaning and sanitizing. | SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-MH-HANDLING |
Equipment inspection logs Material handling records |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.35(a) | 111.35(a) β Equipment Design & Construction | Equipment must be of appropriate design, construction, and workmanship to avoid contamination and allow proper cleaning and maintenance. | SOP-MAINT-FACILITY SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-PROD-PREOP |
Equipment design specs Maintenance records |
| R-111.35(b)(1) | 111.35(b)(1) β Routine Maintenance | Equipment must be maintained to ensure proper function and prevent contamination or mixups. | SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-MAINT-FACILITY |
PM schedules Maintenance logs |
| R-111.35(b)(2) | 111.35(b)(2) β Calibration Requirements | Instruments and controls must be calibrated routinely against certified standards to ensure accuracy. | SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM |
Calibration certificates Calibration logs |
| R-111.35(b)(3) | 111.35(b)(3) β Calibration Documentation | Calibration activities must be documented, including date, method, standard used, and results. | SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM |
Calibration reports Instrument verification logs |
| R-111.35(b)(4) | 111.35(b)(4) β Out-of-Tolerance Controls | If equipment is found out of calibration, appropriate actions must be taken, including evaluating impact on product quality. | SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA |
OOS/OOT investigations Deviation/CAPA records |
| R-111.35(b)(5) | 111.35(b)(5) β Electronic Records & Backups | Electronic systems used for equipment control or recordkeeping must ensure integrity, prevent loss, and provide secure backups. | SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-IT-BACKUP SOP-IT-ESIG SOP-IT-VALIDATE |
Backup logs Access control logs System validation documentation |
| R-111.35(c) | 111.35(c) β Automatic, Mechanical & Electronic Equipment | Automatic, mechanical, or electronic equipment must be routinely checked to ensure proper function, including alarms and monitoring systems. | SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PKG-SETUP |
Pre-op functional checks Maintenance logs |
| R-111.35(d) | 111.35(d) β Cleaning of Equipment | Equipment must be cleaned and sanitized as necessary to prevent contamination, cross-contact, or adulteration. | SOP-PROD-CLEAN SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-PKG-CLEAN SOP-SAN-MASTER |
Cleaning logs Sanitation verification records |
| R-111.70 | 111.70 β Specifications & Controls | Specifications must be established for equipment function, calibration, and process control to ensure proper operation. | SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-PROD-PREOP |
Specification sheets Calibration records Pre-op verification |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.70(a) | 111.70(a) β Component Specifications | Establish specifications for identity, purity, strength, composition, and limits on contaminants for each component used. | SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCP-SAMPLE SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-PROC-DOCS |
Specification sheets COA review records Component test reports |
| R-111.70(b) | 111.70(b) β In-Process Specifications | Establish in-process specifications to ensure proper control of production stages (weighing, blending, encapsulation, filling). | SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-QCP-IPC |
In-process check logs Batch records IPC test sheets |
| R-111.70(c) | 111.70(c) β Finished Product Specifications | Establish specs for identity, purity, strength, composition, and contaminant limits for each finished dietary supplement. | SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QA-REL |
Specification documents Final test results Release packets |
| R-111.70(d) | 111.70(d) β Packaging & Labeling Specifications | Establish specifications to ensure correct packaging components and labels are used, including fill count, closure integrity, and label accuracy. | SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-QCP-IPC |
Packaging specs Label approval files Reconciliation logs |
| R-111.70(e) | 111.70(e) β Labeling Operations Controls | Labeling must be controlled to ensure correct labels are applied, proper batch coding, and no mixups occur. | SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP |
Label verification logs Batch coding checklists |
| R-111.73 | 111.73 β Specifications Must Be Met | All established specifications must be met before materials or products can be approved and released. | SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST |
QC release documentation Test reports |
| R-111.75(a) | 111.75(a) β Component Identity Testing | Each component must be tested for identity before use in manufacturing. | SOP-QCP-SAMPLE SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-WH-RECV |
Identity test results COA comparison logs |
| R-111.75(c) | 111.75(c) β In-Process Testing | In-process materials must be tested as necessary to ensure specifications are met during production stages. | SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-QCP-IPC |
IPC logs Batch records |
| R-111.75(h) | 111.75(h) β Specifications Not Met / Deviations | Any failure to meet specifications requires documented investigation and appropriate corrective actions. | SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QCL-DATA |
Deviation reports CAPA records OOS/OOT logs |
| R-111.80 | 111.80 β Component Control & Sampling | Components must be handled under procedures that prevent mixups, contamination, and ensure proper sampling. | SOP-QA-SAMPLING-PROGRAM SOP-QCP-SAMPLE SOP-WH-RECV SOP-WH-STOR |
Sampling logs Reserve sample files |
| R-111.95 | 111.95 β QC Review of Material Control Systems | QC must review and approve all specifications and processes for component control, in-process control, and finished product release. | SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QA-DEV |
QC approval records Release documentation |
| R-111.117 | 111.117 β Documentation of Production & Process Control System | All production and process control systems must be adequately documented to ensure repeatability, traceability, and compliance. | SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QA-DC SOP-QA-REL |
Batch production records Document control logs |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.120 | 111.120 β QC Approval & Rejection Authority | QC must approve or reject all components, in-process materials, finished products, packaging, labeling, and operations based on whether specifications are met. | SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QA-NCMR |
QC release approvals QC rejection records |
| R-111.123(a) | 111.123(a) β QC Review & Release Decisions | QC must review all required information before releasing or rejecting any component, product, or operation. | SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA |
Release packets QC approval signatures |
| R-111.123(b) | 111.123(b) β Batch Record Review | QC must review every batch production record to ensure accuracy, completeness, and compliance with the MMR before final product release. | SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC |
Batch record review checklists QC release records |
| R-111.123(c) | 111.123(c) β Laboratory Records Review | QC must review and approve all laboratory test resultsβincluding in-process, component, and finished product dataβbefore release. | SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-REL |
Lab data packets QC-reviewed test results |
| R-111.123(d) | 111.123(d) β QC Review of Packaging & Labeling Records | QC must review packaging and labeling operations, including reconciliation, label verification, and line clearance records. | SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-QA-REL |
Label reconciliation logs Packaging batch records |
| R-111.123(e) | 111.123(e) β QC Review of Deviations & OOS | QC must review investigations of deviations, OOS/OOT results, and nonconformances and must approve final conclusions. | SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-NCMR |
Deviation reports OOS investigations CAPA records |
| R-111.127 | 111.127 β QC Oversight of Corrective Actions | QC must ensure corrective actions are implemented when necessary and must verify effectiveness of implemented CAPAs. | SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-IA |
CAPA verification records Audit reports |
| R-111.130 | 111.130 β QC Personnel Responsibilities | QC personnel must be qualified and must oversee all quality-related activities, including review, approval, and documentation control. | SOP-TAL-QUAL SOP-TAL-TRAIN SOP-QA-DC SOP-QA-REL |
Training files QC competency assessments |
| R-111.135 | 111.135 β QC Approval of MMRs | QC must review and approve all Master Manufacturing Records (MMRs) to ensure they contain the required information and controls. | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC |
Approved MMRs MMR change control records |
| R-111.140 | 111.140 β QC Final Disposition Decisions | QC must make final disposition decisions for batches, including approval, rejection, or required reprocessing actions. | SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-NCMR SOP-QA-RETURNS |
Final QC disposition records Release/rejection documentation |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.145(a) | 111.145(a) β Control of Components, In-Process & Finished Materials | Materials must be held under conditions that prevent contamination, mixups, and deterioration. Includes components, in-process materials, and finished supplements. | SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-MH-HANDLING SOP-MH-SEG |
Storage logs Temperature/humidity checks Segregation maps |
| R-111.145(b) | 111.145(b) β Environmental Control of Storage Areas | Storage areas must have appropriate environmental controls as required by product specifications (e.g., temperature, humidity, cleanliness). | SOP-WH-STOR SOP-MAINT-FACILITY |
Environmental logs Facility inspection records |
| R-111.145(c) | 111.145(c) β Prevention of Mixups During Holding | Areas and containers must be labeled and organized to prevent mixups of materials during storage and handling operations. | SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-MH-SEG |
Status labels Storage location logs |
| R-111.150(a) | 111.150(a) β Quarantine Procedures | Components, in-process materials, and finished products must be quarantined until QC releases them. | SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-QA-REL |
Quarantine logs Status control documentation |
| R-111.150(b) | 111.150(b) β Status Identification | All materials must be clearly identified with status (e.g., quarantined, approved, rejected) to prevent unauthorized use. | SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-WH-RACKMAP SOP-QA-REL |
Status tags WIP tracking logs |
| R-111.153 | 111.153 β Requirements for Handling Components | Components must be handled to prevent contamination, deterioration, and mixups during receiving, staging, and transfer activities. | SOP-WH-RECV SOP-MH-HANDLING SOP-MH-SEG |
Receiving logs Material movement logs |
| R-111.155 | 111.155 β Handling of Rejected Materials | Rejected components or products must be clearly identified, segregated, and controlled to prevent accidental use. | SOP-QA-NCMR SOP-QA-REL SOP-WH-STOR |
Rejection tags Disposition records |
| R-111.160 | 111.160 β Release for Distribution | Finished products must not be distributed until QC approves release and all specifications are met. | SOP-QA-REL SOP-WH-SHIP SOP-WH-INVT |
Release documentation Shipping logs |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.205 | 111.205 β MMR Requirements | Each unique formulation and batch size must have an MMR containing instructions and controls necessary to ensure uniformity and consistency in production. | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-DC SOP-QA-REL |
Approved MMR MMR revision history |
| R-111.210(a) | 111.210(a) β Required MMR Components | The MMR must include required elements such as product name, strength, batch size, complete list of components, and their specifications. | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-DC |
MMR content checklist Document control approval |
| R-111.210(b) | 111.210(b) β Theoretical Yield Requirements | MMRs must include theoretical yield, including acceptable yield ranges to detect deviations in actual production. | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-PROD-BATCH |
Yield calculation sheets MMR-approved tolerances |
| R-111.210(c) | 111.210(c) β Manufacturing Instructions | MMRs must include step-by-step manufacturing instructions such as weighing, blending, encapsulation/packaging, and process controls. | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK |
Approved MMR instructions Revision-controlled documents |
| R-111.210(d) | 111.210(d) β Equipment Requirements | MMRs must identify equipment and utensils needed for production and specify controls for their use. | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-MAINT-FACILITY |
Equipment list in MMR Pre-op checklists |
| R-111.210(e) | 111.210(e) β Component Specifications in MMR | MMRs must include the specifications for each component (identity, purity, strength, composition). | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST |
Specification sheets Component test results |
| R-111.210(f) | 111.210(f) β Packaging & Labeling Instructions | MMRs must define packaging and labeling instructions, including label control, batch coding, and reconciliation requirements. | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-QA-REL |
Label approval files Packaging instructions |
| R-111.210(g) | 111.210(g) β MMR Verification & Approval | MMRs must be reviewed, verified, and approved by QC prior to use to ensure completeness and correctness. | SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC |
MMR approval records Change-control documentation |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.255 | 111.255 β BPR Requirements | A BPR must be prepared for each batch and must accurately follow the corresponding MMR, documenting each significant step in production. | SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC |
Executed BPR Operator signatures QC review signatures |
| R-111.260(a) | 111.260(a) β Equipment & Utensil Identification | BPR must identify major equipment and utensils used in batch production to ensure traceability and validation of cleanliness. | SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PROD-CLEAN |
Equipment logs Pre-op checklists |
| R-111.260(b) | 111.260(b) β Component Identification & Weighing | BPR must document the identity and quantity of each component weighed, including lot numbers and verification requirements. | SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-MH-HANDLING |
Weigh tickets Lot traceability logs |
| R-111.260(c) | 111.260(c) β Yield & Yield Verification | BPR must document theoretical vs actual yield and verify that yield is within predetermined acceptable limits. | SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-REL |
Yield records Batch reconciliation sheets |
| R-111.260(d) | 111.260(d) β In-Process Controls Documentation | BPR must document each in-process control (blend uniformity, capsule fill weight, metal detection, count accuracy) and results. | SOP-QCP-IPC SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PKG-PACK |
IPC logs Equipment setup verification |
| R-111.260(e) | 111.260(e) β Line Clearance Documentation | BPR must document line clearance activities prior to manufacturing or packaging to prevent cross-contamination or mixups. | SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-PROD-BATCH |
Line clearance forms Pre-op checklists |
| R-111.260(f) | 111.260(f) β Documentation of Each Manufacturing Step | Each major step must be documented at time of performance with operator signatures, dates, times, and verification when required. | SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK |
Timestamped BPR entries Operator & verifier signatures |
| R-111.260(g) | 111.260(g) β Packaging & Labeling Documentation | BPR must include records of packaging operations including fill count checks, label verification, and reconciliation activities. | SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-QCP-IPC SOP-QA-REL |
Packaging batch records Label reconciliation logs |
| R-111.260(h) | 111.260(h) β Documentation of Cleaning Activities | BPR must document cleaning of equipment, utensils, and production areas when performed during the batch. | SOP-PROD-CLEAN SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-PKG-CLEAN SOP-PROD-BATCH |
Cleaning logs Sanitation verification records |
| R-111.260(i) | 111.260(i) β QC Review & Approval of BPR | BPR must be reviewed and approved by QC to ensure accuracy, completeness, and compliance prior to product release. | SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC SOP-PROD-BATCH |
QC-reviewed BPR Final disposition records |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.303 | 111.303 β Laboratory Control System | A laboratory control system must be established and implemented to ensure testing, approval, and documentation of specifications for components, in-process materials, and finished products. | SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QA-REL |
Lab control logs Test method files Specification approvals |
| R-111.310 | 111.310 β Scientifically Valid Test Methods | Testing must be performed using scientifically valid methods, including identity testing (e.g., FTIR), strength, purity, and composition testing. | SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM |
Validated method sheets Vendor method files Test reports |
| R-111.315 | 111.315 β Laboratory Operations | Laboratory operations must include procedures for sampling, testing, data recording, and review to ensure reliable analytical results. | SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA |
Lab notebooks Instrument logs Analytical worksheets |
| R-111.320 | 111.320 β Laboratory Testing Requirements | Components, in-process materials, and finished batches must be tested as appropriate to ensure compliance with specifications. | SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCP-SAMPLE SOP-QCP-IPC SOP-QA-REL |
Component test reports In-process test logs Finished product COAs |
| R-111.325 | 111.325 β Testing & Approval of Specifications | Specifications for testing must be established and approved, including methods, sampling plans, and acceptance criteria for all materials. | SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA |
Specification sheets Method validation records |
| R-111.330 | 111.330 β Disposition After Testing | Any material failing to meet specifications must be rejected and controlled to prevent unintended use. | SOP-QA-NCMR SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DEV |
Rejection records Disposition documentation |
| R-111.335 | 111.335 β Out-of-Specification (OOS) Investigations | Laboratory must investigate OOS or OOT results, including root cause determination, re-testing, and impact assessment. | SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA |
OOS reports CAPA files Analytical review logs |
| R-111.340 | 111.340 β Laboratory Records | Records of laboratory tests must include sample identification, methods used, results, calculations, and signatures of analysts and reviewers. | SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QA-DC |
Lab data packets Analyst/reviewer signatures Data retention logs |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.353 | 111.353 β Requirements for Manufacturing Operations | Manufacturing operations must be conducted under conditions that prevent mixups, contamination, and ensure consistent product quality. | SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-MH-SEG |
Batch records Pre-op checklists Sanitation logs |
| R-111.355 | 111.355 β Use of Lubricants & Chemicals | Only food-grade or approved lubricants and processing aids may be used, with controls to prevent contamination. | SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-SAN-CLEAN |
Lubricant specification sheets Maintenance logs |
| R-111.360 | 111.360 β Prevention of Contamination & Mixups | Operations must prevent contamination by microorganisms, foreign material, chemicals, and allergens, through adequate equipment and facility controls. | SOP-PROD-FMCONTROL SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-MH-SEG SOP-PROD-PREOP |
Foreign material logs Allergen segregation logs Cleaning documentation |
| R-111.365 | 111.365 β Cross-Contamination & Allergen Controls | Manufacturing processes must include controls to prevent cross-contact, including allergen controls, equipment cleaning, and product sequencing. | SOP-PROD-FMCONTROL SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-MH-SEG |
Allergen control logs Cleaning validation reports |
| R-111.370 | 111.370 β Material Movement Controls | Work-in-process materials must be handled and moved in a way that prevents mixups, contamination, and improper identification. | SOP-MH-HANDLING SOP-MH-SEG SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-PROD-WEIGH |
Material movement logs Status tags Traceability records |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.410 | 111.410 β Label Control System | Establish a label control system that includes issuance, reconciliation, storage, and approval of labels to prevent mixups and mislabeling. | SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC |
Label issuance logs Label reconciliation records |
| R-111.415 | 111.415 β Packaging & Labeling Operations | Packaging operations must ensure correct packaging materials are used, container/closure integrity is maintained, and labeling is accurate. | SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-PKG-CLEAN SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-QCP-IPC |
Packaging batch records Line setup verification forms |
| R-111.420 | 111.420 β Fill & Packaging Controls | Includes requirements for ensuring correct fill weight/count, preventing contamination, and maintaining container/closure integrity. | SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-QCP-IPC |
Fill weight logs Container/closure inspection records |
| R-111.430 | 111.430 β Labeling Operations & Labeling Checks | Labels must be verified for accuracy, correct application, correct lot coding, and must match the product being packaged. | SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-QCP-IPC SOP-QA-REL |
Label verification logs Label reconciliation reports |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.503 | 111.503 β Returned Product Handling | Returned dietary supplements must be identified, quarantined, and evaluated to determine whether they may be salvaged, reprocessed, or must be destroyed. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-QA-REL |
Return log Quarantine records Evaluation forms |
| R-111.510 | 111.510 β Returned Product Investigation | Each returned product must undergo documented evaluation to determine cause of return and whether the product may have been compromised. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QCL-DATA |
Return evaluation forms Deviation reports CAPA files |
| R-111.515 | 111.515 β Returned Product Disposition | QC must approve disposition decisions for returned product, including reprocessing, salvage, return to inventory, or destruction. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-NCMR |
Disposition approvals Destruction records |
| R-111.520 | 111.520 β Salvage | Procedures must ensure salvage operations (recovery of product or components) prevent adulteration and preserve product quality. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-WH-STOR |
Salvage logs Cleaning records QC approval |
| R-111.530 | 111.530 β Reprocessing Controls | Reprocessing must be fully documented, scientifically justified, approved by QC, and must result in a product meeting all specifications. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-REL SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QA-DEV |
Reprocessing justification BPR addendum QC review |
| R-111.535 | 111.535 β Material Review & Disposition (MRB) | Materials failing to meet specifications must undergo MRB review, including QC evaluation and controlled disposition per documented procedures. | SOP-QA-NCMR SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-REL |
MRB forms QC disposition logs |
| R-111.560 | 111.560 β Complaint Handling | Consumer complaints must be recorded, evaluated, and investigated to determine whether product quality, labeling, or manufacturing contributed to the issue. | SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-RETURNS |
Complaint log Investigation files Trend reports |
| R-111.570 | 111.570 β Salvage & Reconditioning Controls | Any salvage or reconditioning must be controlled and validated to ensure the resulting product meets all safety and quality standards. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-CAPA |
Salvage records QC approvals Reprocessing validations |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.603 | 111.603 β General Recordkeeping Requirements | Records must be accurate, legible, indelible, and created at the time of performance. Applies to all manufacturing, packaging, labeling, holding, and testing activities. | SOP-QA-DC SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-IT-ESIG SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QCL-DATA |
Controlled records Timestamped entries Audit trail reports |
| R-111.605 | 111.605 β Required Content of Records | Records must contain all required information, including dates, signatures, identification of material, and results of tests or operations performed. | Inherited from L0 Governance SOP-QA-DC SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QCL-DATA |
Controlled forms Completed batch records Lab data packets |
| R-111.610(a) | 111.610(a) β Record Retention Period | Records must be retained for at least 1 year past the shelf life date or 2 years beyond distribution of the last batch, whichever is longer. | SOP-QA-DC SOP-IT-BACKUP SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-WH-INVT |
Record retention logs Archival documentation |
| R-111.610(b) | 111.610(b) β Accessibility of Records | Records must be readily retrievable for inspection and must be stored to protect against deterioration, loss, or unauthorized access. | SOP-QA-DC SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-IT-BACKUP |
Record archives Access logs Backup restoration reports |
| R-111.610(c) | 111.610(c) β Electronic Records & Backups | Electronic systems used for recordkeeping must ensure accuracy, integrity, security, and reliable backup to prevent data loss. (Cross-ref: 111.35(b)(5)). | SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-IT-BACKUP SOP-IT-ESIG SOP-IT-VALIDATE |
Backup logs System validation reports Access control records |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.560 | 111.560 β Complaint Handling Requirements | Product complaints must be reviewed, evaluated, and investigated when necessary. QC/QA must determine whether the complaint involves possible failure of product quality, packaging, labeling, or manufacturing. | SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QCL-DATA |
Complaint log Investigation reports CAPA files Trend analysis |
| R-111.560(a) | 111.560(a) β Investigation Decision Criteria | Each complaint must be classified and evaluated to determine whether it requires investigation. Investigations are mandatory if the complaint suggests a deviation, contamination, mislabeling, or health risk. | SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA |
Complaint evaluation forms Severity classification logs |
| R-111.560(b) | 111.560(b) β Complaint Investigation Requirements | If an investigation is required, it must be documented and must include batch review, test data review, prior complaint history, and corrective actions as applicable. | SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QCL-DATA |
Investigation reports BPR review documentation OOS/OOT checks |
| R-111.560(c) | 111.560(c) β Complaint Record Content | Complaint records must include: description of complaint, batch/Lot number, actions taken, investigation results, findings, and final QC/QA disposition. | SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DC SOP-QA-REL |
Complaint files Disposition documentation Record retention logs |
| R-111.560(d) | 111.560(d) β Complaint Escalation & Related Actions | Complaints indicating potential adulteration or mislabeling may require escalation to return product evaluation, reprocessing, or recall assessment. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-RECALL SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-DEV |
Escalation records Recall assessment forms CAPA initiation logs |
| ID | 21 CFR Citation | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-111.1 | 111.1 β Applicability | Establishes that 21 CFR 111 applies to manufacturers, packers, and holders of dietary supplements. | Inherited from L0 Governance (No SOPs should map directly) | QMS governance documentation Regulatory scope statements |
| R-111.3 | 111.3 β Definitions | Provides definitions for terms used throughout 21 CFR 111, including component, dietary ingredient, in-process material, quality control, etc. | Inherited from L0 Governance (No SOPs should map directly) | Global definitions index Document glossary references |
| R-111.5 | 111.5 β Personnel Responsibilities | Personnel engaged in manufacturing, packaging, labeling, or holding must comply with applicable requirements to prevent adulteration. | SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP SOP-TAL-TRAIN SOP-TAL-COMP SOP-TAL-QUAL | Training files Hygiene inspection logs Competency assessments |
| Cross-ref to R-111.8 | 111.8 β Illness & Disease Control | This requirement is fully governed under Subpart B; included in Subpart A only for completeness of scope mapping. | (See Subpart B β R-111.8) | Illness reporting logs Exclusion records |
| Cross-ref to R-111.10 | 111.10 β Personnel Hygiene Practices | General hygiene requirements applicable to all personnel; fully governed under Subpart B. | (See Subpart B β R-111.10) | Training records Hygiene logs |
| Cross-ref to R-111.12 | 111.12 β Personnel Qualifications | Personnel must have training, education, and experience necessary to perform assigned functions; fully handled in Subpart B. | (See Subpart B β R-111.12) | Training files Qualification records |
| Cross-ref to R-111.14 | 111.14 β Supervisor Responsibilities | Supervisors must ensure compliance with CGMPs and proper performance of assigned duties; fully handled under Subpart B. | (See Subpart B β R-111.14) | Supervisor oversight logs Training oversight records |
This master crosswalk establishes SNLβs governance alignment with NSF/ANSI 455-2 using the same unified structure as CFR 111. Only clauses applicable to a dry-powder dietary supplement contract manufacturer are included. All wet-processing and non-relevant utility requirements are consolidated in a separate βNot Applicableβ section.
Format:
| ID | Clause | Requirement Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-4.1.1 | 4.1.1 β Supplier Qualification & Monitoring | Requires evaluation, qualification, and ongoing monitoring of suppliers of components, packaging, and critical materials that impact product quality or safety. | SOP-PROC-QUAL SOP-PROC-ASL |
Supplier files Approved Supplier List (ASL) Supplier audit reports |
| N-4.1.3 | 4.1.3 β COA Verification & Supplier Documentation Review | Requires review of supplier documentation and verification that Certificates of Analysis (COAs) match specifications before use. | SOP-WH-RECV SOP-PROC-DOCS SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM |
COA verification logs Receiving inspection records Spec-to-COA match documentation |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-4.2.1 | 4.2.1 β Storage Conditions & Material Protection | Requires materials to be stored under defined conditions that prevent contamination, deterioration, or mixups. | SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT |
Storage logs Temp/humidity records (as applicable) Material status tags |
| N-4.2.3 | 4.2.3 β Environmental Controls & Sanitation | Requires sanitation programs, ATP verification (if used), and environmental controls appropriate for dry-processing. | SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-SAN-EMP |
Sanitation logs ATP results Environmental inspection records |
| N-4.2.8 | 4.2.8 β Personnel Hygiene Requirements | Requires personnel to maintain hygiene standards appropriate to prevent contamination of materials or product. | SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP |
Training records Hygiene inspections |
| N-4.2.9 | 4.2.9 β Employee Illness Reporting | Requires personnel to report health conditions that could pose contamination risks and requires the facility to maintain controls for exclusion. | SOP-PROD-HYGIENE |
Illness reporting log Exclusion records |
| N-4.2.10 | 4.2.10 β Hygienic Practices | Requires hygienic conduct such as handwashing, protective garments, restrictions on jewelry, food, and drink. | SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP |
Hygiene assessments Training documentation |
| N-4.2.11 | 4.2.11 β GMP Personnel Qualifications | Requires adequate training, competency, and qualification of all personnel performing GMP activities. | SOP-TAL-TRAIN SOP-TAL-COMP SOP-TAL-QUAL |
Training files Competency assessments |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-4.3.1 | 4.3.1 β Production Process Controls | Requires documented controls for weighing, blending, encapsulation, and packaging to ensure consistency and prevent contamination. | SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK |
Batch production records IPC logs |
| N-4.3.2 | 4.3.2 β Traceability & Lot Control | Requires complete traceability of components, WIP, and finished goods, including lot identification and status tracking. | SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-MH-HANDLING |
Lot tracking logs WIP status tags |
| N-4.3.3 | 4.3.3 β Contamination, Foreign Material & Allergen Controls | Requires controls for cross-contact, foreign material prevention, and allergen handling appropriate to dry operations. | SOP-PROD-FMCONTROL SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-MH-SEG |
FM control logs Allergen segregation records Cleaning verification |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-4.4.24 | 4.4.24 β Pest Prevention Requirements | Requires a preventive pest program, including elimination of harborages, proper waste handling, and facility design practices that deter pests. | SOP-SAN-PEST SOP-SAN-MASTER |
Pest inspection forms Facility sanitation inspection logs |
| N-4.4.25 | 4.4.25 β Pest Control Program | Requires a documented pest control program performed by trained personnel or licensed external providers. | SOP-SAN-PEST |
Pest control service records Trap maps Monthly service reports |
| N-4.4.26 | 4.4.26 β Pest Control Documentation | Requires documentation supporting monitoring activities, corrective actions, trends, and contractor qualifications. | SOP-SAN-PEST SOP-QA-DC |
Pest trend reports Service logs Corrective action records |
| N-4.4.27 | 4.4.27 β Water System Controls (Non-Product Contact) | Requires water used for sanitation or facility cleaning to be managed under appropriate maintenance and sanitation controls (dry facility exemption applied). | SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-MAINT-FACILITY |
Sanitation logs Maintenance records |
| N-4.4.28 | 4.4.28 β Compressed Air Quality (If Used) | Requires compressed air used in cleaning, conveying, or product-contact operations to be filtered and monitored to prevent contamination. | SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-MAINT-FACILITY |
Preventive maintenance logs Filter change records |
| N-4.4.29 | 4.4.29 β HVAC Controls | Requires HVAC systems to maintain environmental conditions appropriate for dry manufacturing, preventing dust accumulation and cross-contamination. | SOP-MAINT-FACILITY SOP-SAN-MASTER |
HVAC service logs Differential pressure logs (if applicable) |
| N-4.4.30 | 4.4.30 β Utility Documentation | Requires documentation for utilities that may impact product safety or quality (electric, air, water, HVAC). | SOP-MAINT-FACILITY SOP-QA-DC |
Utility inspection logs Maintenance records |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-4.5.2 | 4.5.2 β Equipment Maintenance | Requires routine and preventive maintenance of equipment to ensure proper function and prevent contamination or mixups. | SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-MAINT-FACILITY |
Maintenance logs PM schedules |
| N-4.5.3 | 4.5.3 β Calibration Program | Requires a documented program for calibration of instruments used in weighing, blending, in-process testing, and packaging operations. | SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM SOP-QA-DEV |
Calibration certificates Calibration logs Out-of-tolerance (OOT) investigations |
| N-4.5.23 | 4.5.23 β Packaging Area Sanitation | Requires packaging areas to be cleaned and inspected to prevent material buildup, contamination, or label mixups. | SOP-PKG-CLEAN SOP-SAN-MASTER |
Cleaning logs Pre-op inspection forms |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-4.6.1 | 4.6.1 β Laboratory Control System | Requires controls for laboratory testing activities, including ingredient identity testing and review of lab results. | SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA |
FTIR identity test logs COA comparison documentation |
| N-4.6.3 | 4.6.3 β Analytical Testing Controls | Requires scientifically valid methods and proper controls for outsourced analytical testing (strength, purity, micro, heavy metals). | SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-PROC-DOCS SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM |
Third-party test reports Vendor qualification files |
| N-4.6.4 | 4.6.4 β OOS/OOT Investigation Requirements | Requires investigation of out-of-specification or out-of-trend results with documented root cause and corrective actions. | SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA |
OOS/OOT logs Investigation reports CAPA records |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence (AA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-4.10 | 4.10 β Returned Product Controls | Returned products must be identified, quarantined, evaluated, and documented to determine whether they may be salvaged, reprocessed, or destroyed. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-QA-REL |
Return logs Quarantine records Evaluation forms |
| N-4.11 | 4.11 β Reprocessing & Salvage Requirements | Reprocessing must be scientifically justified, approved by QA, and fully documented. Salvage activities must not risk adulteration or contamination. | SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-REL |
Reprocessing justification CAPA or deviation links QA approval documentation |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-5.1.1 | 5.1.1 β Recordkeeping Requirements | Records must be accurate, indelible, legible, complete, and created at the time of performance. Applies to all operations. | L0 Governance (Recordkeeping Rules) SOP-QA-DC SOP-IT-ESIG SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QCL-DATA |
Controlled records Audit trail logs Timestamped entries |
| N-5.1.2 | 5.1.2 β Documentation Integrity (ALCOA+) | Documentation must follow ALCOA+ principles (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate, Complete, Consistent, Enduring, Available). | L0 Section 3.2 (ALCOA+) SOP-QA-DC SOP-IT-ESIG |
Controlled document set Signature logs Training records |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-5.2.1 | 5.2.1 β Management Review | Requires periodic management review of the quality system, including CAPA trends, deviations, complaints, supplier status, and audit results. | SOP-QA-MGMTREV |
Management review minutes Quality performance dashboards |
| N-5.2.2 | 5.2.2 β Internal Audits | Requires a documented internal audit program covering all applicable NSF and CFR requirements at defined intervals. | SOP-QA-IA |
Audit schedules Audit reports CAPA follow-up records |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-5.3.1 | 5.3.1 β Deviations & Nonconformities | Requires identification, documentation, investigation, and segregation of nonconforming materials, processes, or results. | SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-NCMR SOP-QA-CAPA |
Deviation reports MRB forms Investigation summaries |
| N-5.3.3 | 5.3.3 β Corrective & Preventive Actions (CAPA) | Requires root cause analysis, corrective action planning, effectiveness checks, and closure approval by QA. | SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-DEV |
CAPA logs Effectiveness checks Root cause documentation |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-5.4.1 | 5.4.1 β Complaint System | Requires documentation, evaluation, investigation, trending, and escalation of consumer complaints. | SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA |
Complaint log Investigation files Trend reports |
| ID | Clause | Summary | Primary SOPs | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-5.5.3 | 5.5.3 β Change Control | Requires a controlled process for evaluating, approving, implementing, and documenting changes to procedures, materials, specifications, or systems. | SOP-QA-CC |
Change control records Impact assessments Approval signatures |
The following clauses do not apply to SNL operations due to the facilityβs dry-processing, non-liquid, non-thermal manufacturing scope. These items are outside the operational capabilities or equipment present in SNL's dietary supplement contract manufacturing model.
This executive summary reflects the complete regulatory coverage audit of 21 CFR Part 111, comparing the original Baseline Citation Audit v2 to the updated L0 Unified Governance Model aligned with the SNL Operating Model for a dietary supplement contract manufacturer specializing in dry powders and capsules.
| Baseline Compliance Score: 41% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
The updated L0 model corrects all deficiencies, ensures complete regulatory alignment, and establishes a unified, auditor-ready foundation for SOP deployment within the Family Packs.
| Subpart | Area | Baseline Score | Updated Score | Executive Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | General Provisions | 45% | 100% | Minor omissions corrected |
| B | Personnel & Hygiene | 52% | 100% | Hygiene + qualification controls strengthened |
| C | Facilities & Sanitation | 40% | 100% | Sanitation & facility maintenance rebuilt |
| D | Equipment & Instruments | 38% | 100% | Calibration + OOT/OOS pathways fixed |
| E | Production & Process Control | 35% | 100% | Specifications + IPC architecture corrected |
| F | Quality Control | 41% | 100% | QC authority + approval process restored |
| G | Holding & Distribution | 48% | 100% | Storage, segregation, and status labeling fixed |
| H | MMRs | 44% | 100% | MMR content + QA approval requirements reestablished |
| I | BPRs | 39% | 100% | Yield, IPC, and cleaning documentation rebuilt |
| J | Laboratory Operations | 37% | 100% | Valid methods, OOS investigations corrected |
| K | Manufacturing Ops | 46% | 100% | Cross-contamination + allergen controls added |
| L | Packaging & Labeling | 31% | 100% | One of the weakest areas; label control corrected |
| M | Returned Products | 38% | 100% | Returned product evaluation + MRB integration added |
| N | Records & Recordkeeping | 55% | 100% | Electronic records + retention fixed |
| O | Complaints | 42% | 100% | Investigation + CAPA + recall escalation rebuilt |
| 41% |
| 100% |
The next strategic action is to integrate these corrected mappings directly into the operational Family Packs.
This table shows a side-by-side comparison of baseline vs. updated L0 mappings, with HTML semantic redline formatting.
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Citation: 111.1 Summary: N/A β baseline treated applicability as not requiring mapping. Primary SOPs: None Evidence: None |
Citation: 111.1 Summary: Establishes regulatory scope: 21 CFR 111 applies to manufacturers, packers, and holders of dietary supplements. Primary SOPs: Inherited from L0 Governance (No SOP should map directly) Evidence: QMS governance documentation Regulatory scope statements |
| Baseline accuracy: Incorrect β requirements cannot be marked N/A. |
| Missing elements: Yes β scope mapping & governance references. |
| Audit impact: Medium β auditors expect 111.1 to be acknowledged. |
| Recommendation: Accept New L0 mapping. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Definitions treated as βinformational only.β Primary SOPs: None Evidence: None |
Summary: Defines key terms used throughout 21 CFR 111, including component, dietary ingredient, in-process material, and quality control. Primary SOPs: Inherited from L0 Governance (Definitions index) Evidence: Global definitions index Document glossary references |
| Baseline accuracy: Partially correct but incomplete for L0 mapping. |
| Missing SOP assignment: Should reference L0 definitions governance. |
| Recommendation: New L0 version is accepted. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: "Personnel must ensure compliance with hygiene and GMP responsibilities." (Too generic.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-HYGIENE only Evidence: Hygiene logs only |
Summary: Personnel must prevent adulteration and comply with all assigned CGMP duties across manufacturing, packaging, labeling, and holding. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP SOP-TAL-TRAIN SOP-TAL-COMP SOP-TAL-QUAL Evidence: Training files Competency assessments Hygiene inspection logs |
| Baseline completeness: Incomplete; missing required SOP coverage. |
| Missing SOPs: Yes β training, competency, qualification. |
| Audit impact: Medium. |
| Recommendation: Adopt New L0 mapping. |
The baseline did not include any cross-references, while the New L0 correctly adds anchor rows pointing to Subpart B. This improves regulatory completeness and audit traceability.
| Baseline Compliance Score: 42% |
| New L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Subpart A Final Assessment: Fully compliant and audit-ready.
This comparison evaluates the Baseline Citation Audit v2 mappings against the Updated L0 version you supplied. Red text indicates removed or incorrect baseline content; green text indicates added or corrected L0 mappings.
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Ill employees must avoid contaminating materials. (Baseline summary incomplete and overly brief.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-HYGIENE only Evidence: Hygiene log |
Summary: Personnel with illness, infections, or open lesions must be excluded from operations where contamination of dietary ingredients or supplements is possible. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP Evidence: Illness reporting logs Personnel exclusion records |
| Baseline completeness: Incomplete; missing required SOPs and exclusion documentation. |
| Audit Risk: High β illness controls are a top-5 FDA 483 category. |
| New L0 status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Personnel must maintain cleanliness. (Baseline summary lacks required details.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-HYGIENE only Evidence: Hygiene training |
Summary: Requires proper hygiene practices including handwashing, protective clothing, cleanliness, and prevention of contamination. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-HYGIENE SOP-SAN-EMP Evidence: Hygiene training records Hygiene inspection logs |
| Baseline completeness: Low β omitted PPE, contamination prevention, and training oversight. |
| Audit Risk: Medium β hygiene is always examined in FDA/NSF audits. |
| New L0 status: Fully compliant and aligned with SNL operations. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Personnel must be trained. (Baseline summary insufficient; missing competency and qualification.) Primary SOPs: SOP-TAL-TRAIN only Evidence: Training records |
Summary: Personnel must have the education, training, or experience to perform assigned CGMP duties. Includes qualification, competency, and QA oversight. Primary SOPs: SOP-TAL-TRAIN SOP-TAL-COMP SOP-TAL-QUAL SOP-QA-IA SOP-QA-MGMTREV Evidence: Training records Qualification files Competency assessments |
| Baseline completeness: Low β only training was included. |
| Missing structural requirements: Competency, qualification, and QA verification. |
| Audit Risk: High β FDA frequently cites inadequate personnel qualification. |
| New L0 status: Fully compliant with SNL Talent Program. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Supervisors oversee production (baseline oversimplified). Primary SOPs: None Evidence: None |
Summary: Supervisors must ensure CGMP compliance and verify personnel perform operations correctly and safely. Primary SOPs: SOP-TAL-QUAL SOP-QA-IA SOP-QA-MGMTREV Evidence: Supervisor verifications Training oversight logs |
| Baseline completeness: Very low β critical supervisory QA oversight missing. |
| Regulatory expectation: Supervisory verification is required by FDA. |
| New L0 status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 48% |
| New L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart B is now fully compliant, complete, and aligned with SNLβs operating model.
This audit compares the Baseline Citation Audit v2 mappings with the Updated L0 Version. Redlined content reflects corrections, enhancements, and remediation of gaps.
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Facility must be clean. (Baseline was generic and incomplete.) Primary SOPs: SOP-SAN-CLEAN only Evidence: Cleaning logs |
Summary: Facility must be maintained in a clean, sanitary condition to prevent contamination of components, in-process materials, and finished products. Primary SOPs: SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-MAINT-FACILITY Evidence: Sanitation logs Environmental cleaning records Facility inspection reports |
| Baseline issues: Missing master sanitation, facility PM linkage, and environmental cleaning evidence. |
| Audit risk: High β sanitation is a primary FDA 483 category. |
| New L0 status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Facility should allow effective cleaning. (Baseline lacked contamination prevention details.) Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-FACILITY only Evidence: Facility map only |
Summary: Facilities must be designed and constructed to ensure sanitary operations, efficient cleaning, and prevention of contamination or mixups. Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-FACILITY SOP-SAN-MASTER Evidence: Facility maps Environmental control logs Design review documents |
| Baseline issues: Missing environmental controls and design validation. |
| Audit risk: Medium. |
| New L0 status: Correct and complete. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Contact surfaces must be clean. (Baseline does not address sanitization or cross-contact controls.) Primary SOPs: SOP-SAN-CLEAN only Evidence: Cleaning log |
Summary: All food-contact surfaces must be cleaned and sanitized as necessary to prevent contamination and cross-contact. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-CLEAN SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-PKG-CLEAN Evidence: Cleaning logs ATP results Sanitation verification records |
| Baseline issues: Did not include sanitization validation or packaging-line cleaning. |
| Audit risk: High β contact surface cleaning is heavily audited. |
| New L0 status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Cleaning should occur as needed. (Baseline misses required frequency determination.) Primary SOPs: SOP-SAN-CLEAN only Evidence: Cleaning logs |
Summary: Cleaning must occur at appropriate frequencies to maintain sanitary conditions and prevent buildup of contaminants. Primary SOPs: SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-PROD-CLEAN SOP-PKG-CLEAN Evidence: Master sanitation schedule Cleaning frequency records |
| Baseline issues: No sanitation master schedule reference. |
| Audit risk: Medium. |
| New L0 status: Accurate and complete. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Inspect equipment before use. (Baseline summary lacks detail.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP only Evidence: Pre-op checklist |
Summary: Equipment and utensils must be inspected immediately before use to ensure cleanliness and proper function. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PKG-SETUP Evidence: Pre-op inspection checklists Line clearance records |
| Baseline issues: Did not include packaging setup linkage. |
| Audit risk: Medium. |
| New L0 status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Equipment must be clean and functional. (Too generic; missing design and storage requirements.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP only Evidence: Inspection logs |
Summary: Equipment and utensils must be designed, constructed, and maintained to avoid contamination and allow proper cleaning and sanitizing. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-MH-HANDLING Evidence: Equipment inspection logs Material handling records |
| Baseline issues: No linkage to warehouse/environmental controls or material handling. |
| Audit risk: MediumβHigh. |
| New L0 status: Accurate and complete. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 44% |
| New L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart C is now fully compliant and audit-ready.
This audit compares the Baseline Citation Audit v2 mappings with the updated and standardized L0 version. Semantic HTML redline shows inaccuracies removed (red strikeout) and corrected/new content added (green bold).
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Equipment must be appropriate for use. (Baseline lacked design, construction, and contamination controls.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP only Evidence: Pre-op forms only |
Summary: Equipment must be of appropriate design, construction, and workmanship to avoid contamination and allow proper cleaning and maintenance. Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-FACILITY SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-PROD-PREOP Evidence: Equipment design specs Maintenance records |
| Baseline Issues: Missing facility PM, missing equipment design documentation. |
| Audit Risk: MediumβHigh β poor equipment design links to contamination 483s. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Equipment must be maintained. (Baseline overly generic, lacked PM program linkage.) Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-FACILITY only Evidence: Maintenance log only |
Summary: Equipment must be maintained to ensure proper function and prevent contamination or mixups. Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-MAINT-FACILITY Evidence: PM schedules Maintenance logs |
| Baseline Issues: Missing the PM program, roles, frequencies, and controls. |
| Audit Risk: Medium. |
| New L0 Status: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Instruments must be calibrated. (Baseline did not reference certified standards or traceability.) Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-CAL only Evidence: Calibration logs only |
Summary: Instruments and controls must be calibrated routinely against certified standards to ensure accuracy. Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM Evidence: Calibration certificates Calibration logs |
| Baseline Issues: Missing the calibration program structure & certified standard references. |
| Audit Risk: High β calibration 483s are frequent. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Record calibration info. (Baseline missing: date, method, standard, results.) Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-CAL only Evidence: Calibration log |
Summary: Calibration activities must document date, method, standard used, and results. Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM Evidence: Calibration reports Instrument verification logs |
| Baseline Issues: Did not include documentation completeness requirements. |
| Audit Risk: Medium. |
| New L0 Status: Correct and complete. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Handle calibration failures. (Baseline did not include impact assessment or QC oversight.) Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-CAL only Evidence: OOT log |
Summary: If equipment is out of calibration, appropriate actions must be taken, including evaluating product impact and performing formal investigations. Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-MAINT-CAL-PROGRAM SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA Evidence: OOS/OOT investigations CAPA records |
| Baseline Issues: Missing CAPA & deviation tie-ins. |
| Audit Risk: High β impact assessment is mandatory. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Records must be backed up. (Baseline missing system validation, access controls, and traceability.) Primary SOPs: SOP-IT-BACKUP only Evidence: Backup logs |
Summary: Electronic systems used for equipment control or recordkeeping must ensure integrity, prevent loss, enforce secure access, and include validated backups. Primary SOPs: SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-IT-BACKUP SOP-IT-ESIG SOP-IT-VALIDATE Evidence: Backup logs Access control logs System validation documentation |
| Baseline Issues: Missing data integrity program, validation, user access controls. |
| Audit Risk: Very High β data integrity is a priority FDA enforcement area. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Equipment must be checked. (Baseline lacked alarm checks, electronic controls, and routine monitoring.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP only Evidence: Pre-op logs |
Summary: Automatic, mechanical, or electronic equipment must be routinely checked to ensure proper function, including alarms and monitoring systems. Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PKG-SETUP Evidence: Pre-op functional checks Maintenance logs |
| Baseline Issues: Missed automated system monitoring and alarm verification. |
| Audit Risk: Medium. |
| New L0 Status: Correct and complete. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Equipment must be cleaned. (Baseline missing sanitation validation, allergens, and cross-contact controls.) Primary SOPs: SOP-SAN-CLEAN only Evidence: Cleaning log only |
Summary: Equipment must be cleaned and sanitized as necessary to prevent contamination, cross-contact, or adulteration. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-CLEAN SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-PKG-CLEAN SOP-SAN-MASTER Evidence: Cleaning logs Sanitation verification records |
| Baseline Issues: No allergen or FM cross-contact reference. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | New L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Specifications should be documented. (Baseline not tied to calibration, PM, or operational controls.) Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-PM only Evidence: Equipment spec sheets only |
Summary: Specifications must be established for equipment function, calibration, and process control to ensure proper operation. Primary SOPs: SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-MAINT-CAL SOP-PROD-PREOP Evidence: Specification sheets Calibration records Pre-op verification |
| Baseline Issues: Missing linkages to calibration and production pre-op verification. |
| Audit Risk: Medium. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 41% |
| New L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart D is fully compliant, complete, and aligned with SNLβs equipment, maintenance, calibration, and data integrity programs.
This audit compares Baseline Citation Audit v2 against the updated L0 mappings. Redline: removed vs. added/correct. Focus: component specifications, in-process controls, finished product specifications, material control, QC requirements, and documentation.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Establish component specs. (Baseline lacked identity/purity/strength/contaminant linkage.) Primary SOPs: SOP-WH-RECV only Evidence: COA review only |
Summary: Specifications for identity, purity, strength, composition, and contaminant limits must be established for each component. Primary SOPs: SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCP-SAMPLE SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-PROC-DOCS Evidence: Specification sheets COA review logs Component test results |
| Baseline Gaps: Missing full spec model; no purity/strength/composition linkage. |
| Audit Risk: High β this is a core CGMP failure point. |
| New L0 Status: Fully corrected. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Define IPC specs. (Baseline did not connect blend uniformity, encapsulation, or packaging IPCs.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-WEIGH only Evidence: IPC checks (generic) |
Summary: In-process specifications must be established for weighing, blending, encapsulation, packaging, and IPC testing. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-QCP-IPC Evidence: In-process check logs Batch records IPC test sheets |
| Baseline Gaps: No mapping to blend uniformity, fill weight, metal detection, or label verification. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0 Status: Correct and complete. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Finished specs required. (Baseline only referenced release testing, missing purity/strength/contaminants.) Primary SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST only Evidence: COA only |
Summary: Finished product specs must include identity, purity, strength, composition, and contaminant limits. Primary SOPs: SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Specification documents Final test reports Release packets |
| Baseline Gaps: Identity-only testing; purity, strength, and composition not defined. |
| Audit Risk: Critical. |
| New L0 Status: Fully remediated. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Packaging specs required. (Baseline lacked reconciliation, fill verification, and label accuracy.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PKG-PACK only Evidence: Packaging record |
Summary: Packaging & labeling specifications must ensure correct materials, label accuracy, batch coding, and reconciliation. Primary SOPs: SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-QCP-IPC Evidence: Packaging specs Label approval files Reconciliation logs |
| Baseline Gaps: Missing reconciliation, incorrect label prevention, and coding checks. |
| Audit Risk: High β mislabeling is a top FDA enforcement point. |
| New L0 Status: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Control labeling. (Baseline lacked batch coding checks and duplicate label control.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PKG-LABEL only Evidence: Label checklist |
Summary: Labeling operations must implement controls to ensure correct labels, batch codes, and reconciliation. Primary SOPs: SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP Evidence: Label verification logs Batch coding checklists |
| Baseline Gaps: Did not include reconciliation or coding controls. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Specs must be met. (Baseline did not tie QC disposition to specifications.) Primary SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST only Evidence: Test results |
Summary: All established specifications must be met before materials/products can be approved and released. Primary SOPs: SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST Evidence: QC release documentation Test reports |
| Baseline Gaps: Missing QC approval requirements. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0 Status: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Identity test components. (Baseline did not include requirement of testing every component.) Primary SOPs: SOP-WH-RECV only Evidence: COA comparison |
Summary: Each component must be tested for identity before use in manufacturing. Primary SOPs: SOP-QCP-SAMPLE SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-WH-RECV Evidence: Identity test results COA comparison logs |
| Baseline Gaps: Baseline incorrectly permitted COA-only acceptance. |
| Audit Risk: Critical β FDA requires 100% identity testing. |
| New L0 Status: Correct and audit-ready. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Perform in-process tests. (Baseline did not connect to process-specific IPCs.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-BLEND only Evidence: IPC logs (nonspecific) |
Summary: In-process materials must be tested as necessary to ensure specifications are met. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-QCP-IPC Evidence: IPC logs Batch records |
| Baseline Gaps: Missing encapsulation controls and weight checks. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Investigate deviations. (Baseline missing CAPA linkage, missing QC oversight.) Primary SOPs: SOP-QA-DEV only Evidence: Deviation reports |
Summary: Failures to meet specifications require documented investigation, QC review, and CAPA as appropriate. Primary SOPs: SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence: Deviation reports OOS/OOT investigations CAPA files |
| Baseline Gaps: No CAPA requirement, no QC approval, no OOS linkage. |
| Audit Risk: Very High. |
| New L0 Status: Fully corrected. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Handle components properly. (Baseline missing sampling program and warehousing segregation.) Primary SOPs: SOP-QCP-SAMPLE only Evidence: Sampling logs only |
Summary: Components must be controlled and sampled to prevent mixups, contamination, and misidentification. Primary SOPs: SOP-QA-SAMPLING-PROGRAM SOP-QCP-SAMPLE SOP-WH-RECV SOP-WH-STOR Evidence: Sampling logs Reserve sample files |
| Baseline Gaps: No segregation, no quarantine linkage, no formal sampling program. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0 Status: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: QC reviews materials. (Baseline lacked specification approval, deviation review, and QC obligation to reject.) Primary SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST only Evidence: QC checklist |
Summary: QC must review and approve all specifications and processes for component control, IPC, and finished product release. Primary SOPs: SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QA-DEV Evidence: QC approval records Release documentation |
| Baseline Gaps: Missing QC-approved specifications and formal release process. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Document production controls. (Baseline did not link to MMR, BPR, DC, or QC review.) Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-BATCH only Evidence: Batch record |
Summary: Production & process control systems must be fully documented to ensure traceability, repeatability, and compliance. Primary SOPs: SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QA-DC SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Batch production records Document control logs |
| Baseline Gaps: Missing document control link, missing QC review, missing traceability requirements. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 38% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart E is now fully aligned with the SNL dry-blending & encapsulation contract manufacturing model, and meets all requirements of 21 CFR 111.70β111.117.
This hybrid redline evaluates Baseline Citation Audit v2 against the updated L0 mapping for QC Operations. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs. added/correct. Subpart F is a high-risk FDA focus area β QC authority, review, approval, and documentation are mandatory.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: QC approves or rejects components/products. (Baseline lacked full scope of QC authority β no link to packaging/labeling, no reference to IPC, no MRB controls.) Primary SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST Evidence: COA approval |
Summary: QC must approve/reject all components, in-process materials, finished products, packaging & labeling operations, and production stages based on specifications. Primary SOPs: SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QA-NCMR Evidence: QC release approvals QC rejection records |
| Baseline Gap: QC role was incomplete; did not include packaging/labeling or IPC authority. |
| Audit Risk: Critical β FDA cites this frequently. |
| New L0 Status: Fully corrected. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: QC reviews release data. (Baseline lacked requirement to review *all* required records before disposition.) Primary SOPs SOP-QCL-TEST Evidence QC approval signature only |
Summary: QC must review all relevant information prior to approving or rejecting materials or products. Primary SOPs SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA Evidence Release packets QC approval records |
| Baseline did not include batch review, test review, or deviation history review. |
| Audit Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully aligned. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: QC reviews BPR. (Baseline did not require completeness check or confirmation against MMR.) SOPs: SOP-PROD-BATCH Evidence: BPR signature |
Summary: QC must review each BPR for accuracy, completeness, correct execution, and compliance with the MMR. SOPs: SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC Evidence: BPR review checklist QC release documentation |
| BPR completeness, calculations, and dual-signature verifications were missing in baseline. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
QC reviews lab data. (Baseline did not require method verification, trend review, or OOS scrutiny.) SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST Evidence: COA only |
QC must review and approve all laboratory records before release, including methods, results, calculations, and investigations.
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Lab data packets QC-reviewed results |
| Baseline ignored OOS/OOT and method validity. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
QC verifies packaging. (Baseline missed reconciliation, coding checks, and setup verifications.) SOPs: SOP-PKG-PACK Evidence: Packaging record only |
QC must review label control, reconciliation, coding, line clearance, and packaging accuracy before release.
SOPs: SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Label reconciliation logs Packaging batch records |
| Baseline missing reconciliation and coding verification. |
| Risk: High (mislabeling is #1 FDA recall cause). |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Review deviations. (Baseline missing CAPA link; QC not required to approve conclusion.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-DEV Evidence: Deviation form |
QC must review and approve all deviation, OOS, and OOT investigations β including root cause, CAPA, and final disposition.
SOPs: SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-NCMR Evidence: Investigation reports CAPA records OOS logs |
| Baseline missing QC approval and CAPA effectiveness verification. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
QC ensures CAPA. (Baseline lacked requirement for verifying CAPA effectiveness.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-CAPA Evidence: CAPA form |
QC must ensure corrective actions are implemented and verify the effectiveness of all CAPA activities.
SOPs: SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-IA Evidence: CAPA verification records Audit findings |
| Baseline completely ignored effectiveness checks. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully aligned. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
QC personnel must be qualified. (Baseline omitted competency evaluation and training documentation.)
SOPs: SOP-TAL-TRAIN Evidence: Training file |
QC personnel must be qualified, trained, and competent to perform all QC responsibilities including approvals, reviews, and documentation control.
SOPs: SOP-TAL-QUAL SOP-TAL-TRAIN SOP-QA-DC SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Training files Competency assessments |
| Baseline lacked qualification requirements. |
| Risk: Moderate. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
QC approves MMR. (Baseline missing verification of completeness and specification alignment.)
SOPs: SOP-PROD-MMR Evidence: MMR approval signature |
QC must review and approve all MMRs to ensure required content, accuracy, completeness, and alignment with product specifications.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC Evidence: Approved MMR Change control records |
| Baseline missing DC linkage and specification alignment review. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
QC disposes batches. (Baseline did not include rejection, reprocessing authorization, or MRB requirements.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Release signature |
QC must make final disposition decisions for all batches, including approval, rejection, reprocessing, or salvage per procedure.
SOPs: SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-NCMR SOP-QA-RETURNS Evidence: Final QC disposition records Release/rejection documentation |
| Baseline did not include MRB, reprocessing controls, or rejection authority. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 41% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart F is now fully aligned with SNLβs dry-blend, encapsulation, and packaging QC model. All required QC authorities, reviews, approvals, and documentation controls are correctly installed.
This hybrid redline compares Baseline Citation Audit v2 to the updated L0 version for Subpart G β Holding, Distribution & Material Control. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary: Materials must be stored properly. (Baseline missing controls for segregation, WIP identification, and contamination prevention.) SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR only Evidence: Storage logs only |
Summary: Materials must be held under conditions that prevent contamination, mixups, deterioration, or misidentification. Applies to components, in-process materials, and finished product. SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-MH-HANDLING SOP-MH-SEG Evidence: Storage logs Temp/Humidity logs Segregation maps |
| Baseline Gap: No WIP controls, no segregation controls, no cross-contamination safeguards. |
| Risk: High β FDA observes mixup risk as a major citation. |
| New L0 Status: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Storage areas must have proper temperature. (Baseline missing humidity, cleanliness, pest-prevention, or specification-based control.)
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR Evidence: Temp logs |
Storage areas must maintain all environmental controls required by the product spec: temperature, humidity, cleanliness, and facility condition.
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR SOP-MAINT-FACILITY Evidence: Environmental logs Facility inspection reports |
| Baseline ignored humidity and cleanliness requirements. |
| Risk: Moderate. |
| New L0: Correct and complete. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Materials must be identified. (Baseline did not include container labeling, rack mapping, and zone-based segregation.)
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR Evidence: Label tags |
Areas, racks, and containers must be labeled and controlled to prevent material mixups or incorrect use.
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-MH-SEG Evidence: Status labels Rack maps Location logs |
| Baseline: No rack mapping, location verification, or segregation. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully compliant with warehouse best practices. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Quarantine until QC releases. (Baseline missing physical or electronic quarantine requirements.)
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR Evidence: Quarantine tags |
Components, in-process materials, and finished products must be quarantined until QC release.
Physical, electronic, or zone-based quarantine must prevent unintended use.
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Quarantine logs Access-controlled zones Status control documentation |
| Baseline lacked electronic quarantine and QC approval requirements. |
| Risk: High β prevents unintended material use. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Material must show status. (Baseline limited to a tag; no inventory-system control, no rejection/hold indicators.)
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR Evidence: Status card |
All materials must display status (quarantined, approved, rejected) via physical labeling and/or ERP-driven controls.
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-WH-RACKMAP SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Status tags WIP tracking logs ERP status controls |
| Baseline lacked rejected status, bin-level control, and ERP integration. |
| Risk: High β mixups & wrong status use. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Handle components properly. (Baseline omitted cross-contact controls, PPE, receiving checks, and staging controls.)
SOPs: SOP-WH-RECV Evidence: Receiving tags |
Components must be handled to prevent contamination, deterioration, misidentification, and mixups during receiving, staging, and transport.
SOPs: SOP-WH-RECV SOP-MH-HANDLING SOP-MH-SEG Evidence: Receiving logs Material movement logs |
| Baseline ignored staging, cross-contact, and segregation. |
| Risk: Medium. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Rejected materials must be separated. (Baseline did not include QC authorization, MRB review, secure storage, or documented disposition.)
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR Evidence: Rejected tag |
Rejected materials must be clearly identified, physically or electronically segregated, and controlled to prevent use.
SOPs: SOP-QA-NCMR SOP-QA-REL SOP-WH-STOR Evidence: Rejection tags MRB disposition logs |
| Baseline lacked MRB linkage and controlled segregation. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Product must be released by QC. (Baseline did not require all specifications to be met or link to BPR review.)
SOPs: SOP-WH-SHIP Evidence: Shipping log |
Finished products must not be distributed until QC approves release and all specifications, records, and test results are verified.
SOPs: SOP-QA-REL SOP-WH-SHIP SOP-WH-INVT Evidence: Release documentation Shipping authorization logs |
| Baseline did not tie release to meeting *all* specifications. |
| Risk: Critical β directly tied to distribution of adulterated product. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 39% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart G is now fully compliant and aligned with a modern dietary supplement warehouse, WIP, and distribution control model. Mixup prevention, quarantine, and material status controls are correctly addressed across SOPs.
This hybrid redline compares the Baseline Citation Audit v2 to the updated L0. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary Each product must have an MMR. (Baseline missing requirement for unique formula + batch size; no controls for consistency or CGMP.) SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR only Evidence MMR document |
Summary Each unique formulation and batch size must have an MMR containing all controls necessary to ensure uniformity, consistency, and CGMP compliance. SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-DC SOP-QA-REL Evidence Approved MMR MMR revision history |
| Baseline missing uniformity controls, batch-size requirement, and documentation controls. |
| Risk: Critical β common FDA target. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
MMR must include necessary information. (Baseline lacked product name, strength, batch size, and complete component list.)
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR Evidence MMR header |
The MMR must include product name, strength, batch size, complete list of components, and component specifications.
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-DC Evidence MMR content checklist Document control approval |
| Baseline did not list required MMR elements. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
MMR should list yields. (Baseline missing theoretical yield definition + acceptable deviation range.)
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR Evidence Yield field |
MMR must include theoretical yield and acceptable yield ranges for variance monitoring and deviation detection.
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-PROD-BATCH Evidence Yield calculation sheets MMR-approved tolerances |
| Baseline missing theoretical yield AND acceptable range requirement. |
| Risk: ModerateβHigh. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Include instructions. (Baseline lacked step-by-step instructions and no process control requirements.)
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR Evidence Draft instructions |
MMR must include complete manufacturing instructions: weighing, blending, encapsulation, filling, packaging, and IPC controls.
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK Evidence MMR instruction sheets Revision-controlled documents |
| Baseline omitted all production step detail. |
| Risk: Critical β manufacturing consistency depends on this. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Identify equipment. (Baseline missing requirement to specify equipment control requirements.)
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR Evidence Equipment list only |
MMR must specify equipment and utensils required and include process controls for equipment use.
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-MAINT-FACILITY Evidence: Equipment list in MMR Pre-op checklists |
| Baseline missed equipment control requirements. |
| Risk: Moderate. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Include specs. (Baseline missing linkage to component program + test requirements.)
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR Evidence Component list only |
The MMR must include specifications for each component (identity, purity, strength, composition).
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST Evidence: Specification sheets Component COA test results |
| Baseline lacked required specification categories. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
Include packaging instructions. (Baseline missing reconciliation, label control, batch coding, and material verification.)
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR Evidence Packaging step |
MMR must define packaging and labeling instructions, including label control, reconciliation, coding, and verification steps.
SOPs SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Label approval files Packaging instructions |
| Baseline missing FDA-required labeling controls. |
| Risk: Critical β mislabeling is FDA recall driver #1. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline | Updated L0 |
|---|---|
|
MMR must be approved. (Baseline missing verification step, QC approval requirements, and DC linkage.)
SOPs: SOP-PROD-MMR Evidence: Approval block only |
MMRs must be reviewed, verified, and approved by QC before use to ensure completeness and correctness.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC Evidence: MMR approval records Change control documentation |
| Baseline missing verification + DC controls. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 38% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart H is now fully compliant and consistent with an SNL-grade dietary supplement manufacturing environment. All MMR content, controls, approval pathways, and SOP linkages are properly defined.
This hybrid audit compares Baseline Citation Audit v2 with the updated L0 authoritative mapping. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Summary Each batch must have a BPR. (Baseline missing requirement that BPR must accurately follow the MMR, document each significant step, and include operator & QC signatures.) SOPs SOP-PROD-BATCH only Evidence Batch record |
Summary A BPR must be prepared for each batch and must accurately follow the MMR, documenting each significant step in manufacturing. SOPs SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC Evidence Executed BPR Operator signatures QC review and approval signatures |
| Baseline lacked MMR linkage, step-by-step documentation, and QC approvals. |
| Risk: Critical β FDA primary enforcement target. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Identify equipment used.
(Baseline missing requirement for traceability, cleanliness verification, pre-use inspection linkage.)
SOPs SOP-PROD-BATCH Evidence Equipment list |
BPR must identify all major equipment and utensils used, enabling traceability and verification of cleanliness and pre-operational inspection.
SOPs SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PROD-CLEAN Evidence Equipment logs Pre-op inspection checklists |
| Baseline failed to require traceability of equipment β regulatory gap. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Record weighed components.
(Baseline missing identity verification, lot number recording, and verification steps.)
SOPs SOP-PROD-WEIGH Evidence Weigh sheet |
BPR must document identity and quantity of each component, including lot number, verification, and traceability to the MMR.
SOPs SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-MH-HANDLING Evidence Weigh tickets Lot traceability logs |
| Baseline missing component identity and lot-number requirements. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Record actual yield.
(Baseline missing theoretical vs actual comparison, acceptable limits, and deviation triggers.)
SOPs: SOP-PROD-BATCH Evidence: Yield entry |
BPR must document theoretical vs actual yield, verify acceptability against defined limits, and trigger investigation if outside range.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-PROD-MMR SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Yield records Batch reconciliation sheets |
| Baseline lacked yield verification mechanism β severe audit risk. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Record IPC checks.
(Baseline missing linkage to blend uniformity, capsule weights, metal detection, count accuracy.)
SOPs: SOP-QCP-IPC Evidence: IPC entry |
BPR must document each in-process control, including results for blending, encapsulation, filling, packaging, and monitoring devices.
SOPs: SOP-QCP-IPC SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PKG-PACK Evidence: IPC logs Equipment setup verification |
| Baseline too generic β did not match FDA expectations for IPC specificity. |
| Risk: ModerateβHigh. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Verify line clearance.
(Baseline missing documented evidence, dual verification, and applicability to packaging lines.)
SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP Evidence: Clearance note |
BPR must document line clearance activities prior to manufacturing or packaging, including verification of cleanliness and removal of previous materials.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-PROD-BATCH Evidence: Line clearance forms Pre-op checklists |
| Baseline lacked documented clearance β FDA considers this a material deficiency. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Record manufacturing steps.
(Baseline missing timestamps, operator signatures, sequencing, and verification.)
SOPs: SOP-PROD-BATCH Evidence: Step list |
Each major step must be documented at time of performance, including date, time, operator signature, and required verification.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK Evidence: Timestamped BPR entries Operator & verifier signatures |
| Baseline lacked required real-time signatures β major data integrity failure. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Include packaging information.
(Baseline missing fill count, label verification, reconciliation, and coding documentation.)
SOPs: SOP-PKG-PACK Evidence: Packaging record |
BPR must include detailed packaging operations, including fill count checks, label verification, and reconciliation.
SOPs: SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-QCP-IPC SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Packaging batch records Label reconciliation logs |
| Baseline lacked reconciliation linkage β major FDA deficiency. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Record cleaning activities.
(Baseline missing timing, cleaning validation, allergen risk controls, and linkage to sanitation program.)
SOPs: SOP-PROD-CLEAN Evidence: Cleaning entry |
BPR must document cleaning of equipment, utensils, and production areas performed during the batch.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-CLEAN SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-PKG-CLEAN SOP-PROD-BATCH Evidence: Cleaning logs Sanitation verification records |
| Baseline too narrow β ignored allergen/cross-contact controls. |
| Risk: ModerateβHigh. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
QC must approve BPR.
(Baseline missing requirement for completeness review, accuracy checks, and cross-verification with the MMR.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-REL Evidence: QC sign-off |
BPR must be reviewed and approved by QC to ensure accuracy, completeness, and compliance prior to release.
SOPs: SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC SOP-PROD-BATCH Evidence: QC-reviewed BPR Final disposition records |
| Baseline lacked completeness checks + DC linkage. |
| Risk: Critical β direct release liability. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 42% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart I is now fully compliant. All BPR requirements β including equipment identification, component traceability, yield verification, IPC documentation, line clearance, step-by-step execution, cleaning documentation, and QC final approval β are correctly controlled and mapped.
This hybrid audit compares Baseline Citation Audit v2 with the updated authoritative L0 mapping. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Lab must test materials.
(Baseline missing requirement for full laboratory control system, specification approvals, and QC oversight.)
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST only Evidence: Lab tests |
A laboratory control system must be established and implemented to ensure testing, approval, and documentation of specifications for components, in-process materials, and finished products.
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Lab control logs Specification approvals Test method files |
| Baseline lacked documentation, approval, and system-level requirements. |
| Risk: Critical β FDA expects full laboratory governance. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Use valid test methods.
(Baseline missing validation, method suitability, documentation requirements.)
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST Evidence: Test results |
Testing must be performed using scientifically valid methods, including identity, purity, strength, and composition testing.
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM Evidence: Validated method sheets Method suitability documents Test reports |
| Baseline failed to mention method validity β common FDA 483. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Perform lab tests.
(Baseline missing sampling, data recording, instrument log requirements.)
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST only Evidence: Lab notebook |
Laboratory operations must include procedures for sampling, testing, data recording, instrument logs, and review to ensure analytical reliability.
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence: Lab notebooks Instrument logs Analytical worksheets |
| Baseline omitted instrument logs + data recording rules. |
| Risk: Moderate. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Test materials as needed.
(Baseline missing component testing, in-process testing, and finished-product COAs.)
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST only Evidence: Test results |
Components, in-process materials, and finished batches must be tested as appropriate to ensure they meet established specifications.
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCP-SAMPLE SOP-QCP-IPC SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Component test reports In-process test logs Finished product COAs |
| Baseline incomplete β no linkage to component or finished product tests. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Approve specifications.
(Baseline missing acceptance criteria, sampling plans, method validation.)
SOPs: SOP-QCL-TEST only Evidence: Spec sheet |
Specifications for testing must be established and approved, including sampling plans, test methods, and acceptance criteria.
SOPs: SOP-QA-SPEC-PROGRAM SOP-QCL-TEST SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence: Specification sheets Method validation records |
| Baseline lacked validation β major compliance failure. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 39% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart J is now fully compliant. All laboratory operations, testing requirements, method validity, specification approval, and data governance expectations are fully addressed.
This hybrid audit compares Baseline Citation Audit v2 with the updated authoritative L0 manufacturing operations mapping. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Manufacturing operations must be controlled.
(Baseline missing controls to prevent mixups, contamination, foreign material entry, and environmental monitoring expectations.)
SOPs: SOP-PROD-WEIGH, SOP-PROD-BLEND only Evidence: Batch record |
Manufacturing operations must ensure prevention of mixups, contamination, foreign material intrusion, allergen cross-contact, and maintain controlled conditions across all production stages.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-PROD-BLEND SOP-PROD-ENCAP SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-MH-SEG Evidence: Batch records Pre-op checklists Sanitation logs |
| Baseline incomplete β lacked segregation, allergen, and foreign material controls. |
| Risk: Critical β direct contamination risk. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Use food-grade lubricants.
(Baseline missing controls for contamination prevention, documentation of use, and verification of appropriate grade.)
SOPs: SOP-MAINT-PM only Evidence: Maintenance log |
Only food-grade or approved lubricants may be used, with documented controls to prevent contamination of components and product-contact surfaces.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-MAINT-PM SOP-SAN-CLEAN Evidence: Lubricant specifications Maintenance logs |
| Baseline lacked product-contact contamination controls. |
| Risk: ModerateβHigh. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Prevent contamination.
(Baseline missing foreign material controls, allergen controls, sequencing, and sanitation validation linkage.)
SOPs: SOP-PROD-PREOP only Evidence: Pre-op inspection |
Operations must prevent contamination by microorganisms, foreign material, chemicals, and allergens through adequate equipment controls, facility controls, environmental monitoring, and sanitation procedures.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-FMCONTROL SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-MH-SEG SOP-PROD-PREOP Evidence: Foreign material logs Allergen control logs Cleaning documentation |
| Baseline failed to address allergen risks or FM control requirements. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Prevent cross-contact.
(Baseline missing allergen segregation, equipment cleaning validation, sequencing, and risk assessment linkage.)
SOPs: SOP-SAN-CLEAN only Evidence: Cleaning record |
Manufacturing must include controls to prevent cross-contact, including allergen segregation, validated cleaning processes, product sequencing, and handling controls.
SOPs: SOP-PROD-FMCONTROL SOP-SAN-MASTER SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-MH-SEG Evidence: Allergen logs Cleaning validation reports |
| Baseline lacked allergen program detail + cleaning validation. |
| Risk: Critical β major FDA enforcement category. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Control WIP movement.
(Baseline missing traceability, labeling, staging controls, and segregation requirements.)
SOPs: SOP-WH-STOR only Evidence: Movement log |
Work-in-process materials must be handled and moved in a manner that prevents mixups, contamination, incorrect identification, or loss of traceability.
SOPs: SOP-MH-HANDLING SOP-MH-SEG SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-PROD-WEIGH Evidence: Material movement logs Status tags Traceability records |
| Baseline provided no segregation or traceability linkage. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 41% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart K is now fully compliant. Controls for contamination, foreign material, allergen management, sanitation, equipment pre-op, sequencing, and WIP traceability are all appropriately mapped and governed.
This hybrid audit compares Baseline Citation Audit v2 with the updated authoritative L0 Packaging & Labeling mapping. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Establish label controls.
(Baseline missing issuance, reconciliation, controlled storage, and approval requirements.)
SOPs: SOP-PKG-LABEL only Evidence: Label log |
A label control system must be established including issuance, reconciliation, storage controls, and approval of labels to prevent mislabeling and mixups.
SOPs: SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-DC Evidence: Label issuance logs Label reconciliation records |
| Baseline lacked reconciliation + storage controls β FDA 483 hotspot. |
| Risk: Critical β mislabeling risk. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Control packaging operations.
(Baseline missing line setup verification, container/closure integrity, and IPC requirements.)
SOPs: SOP-PKG-PACK only Evidence: Packaging batch record |
Packaging operations must ensure correct packaging components, proper line setup, container/closure integrity, sanitation, and correct labeling.
SOPs: SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-PKG-CLEAN SOP-PROD-PREOP SOP-QCP-IPC Evidence: Packaging batch records Line setup verification forms |
| Baseline missing container/closure controls + IPC linkage. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully accurate. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Check fill accuracy.
(Baseline missing weight/count verification procedures, container integrity requirements, and IPC documentation.)
SOPs: SOP-PKG-PACK only Evidence: Fill record |
Fill controls must ensure correct fill weight or count, container integrity, and prevent contamination during filling and sealing operations.
SOPs: SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PROD-WEIGH SOP-QCP-IPC Evidence: Fill weight logs Container/closure inspection records |
| Baseline lacked weight/count verification β key release requirement. |
| Risk: ModerateβHigh. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Verify labels.
(Baseline missing dual verification, label reconciliation, coding checks, and QC review.)
SOPs: SOP-PKG-LABEL only Evidence: Label check |
Labels must be verified for accuracy, correct lot/batch coding, correct application, and must be reconciled to prevent mislabeling or mixups.
SOPs: SOP-PKG-LABEL SOP-PKG-PACK SOP-PKG-SETUP SOP-QCP-IPC SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Label verification logs Label reconciliation reports |
| Baseline omitted reconciliation + coding + QC release linkage β major compliance failure. |
| Risk: Critical β mislabeling leading to recall. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 38% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart L is now fully compliant. Controls for label issuance, reconciliation, packaging operations, fill accuracy, container/closure integrity, and final QC verification are all properly established and mapped.
This hybrid audit compares Baseline Citation Audit v2 with the updated authoritative L0 mapping for Returned Products, Salvage, Reprocessing, MRB, and Complaint Linkages. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Returned products must be evaluated.
(Baseline missing quarantine requirements, traceability, evaluation criteria, and linkage to QC release.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS only Evidence: Return log |
Returned dietary supplements must be identified, quarantined, and evaluated to determine whether they may be salvaged, reprocessed, returned to inventory, or destroyed.
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-WH-STOR SOP-WH-INVT SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Return log Quarantine records Evaluation forms |
| Baseline omitted quarantine + decision criteria β major FDA gap. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Investigate returns as needed.
(Baseline missing documentation requirements, failure mode analysis, and CAPA linkage.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS only Evidence: Investigation record |
Returned product must undergo documented evaluation to determine cause of return and whether the product may have been compromised.
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence: Return evaluation forms Deviation reports CAPA files |
| Baseline lacked root-cause documentation + CAPA integration. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Correct and complete. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Approve disposition.
(Baseline missing QC final approval, inventory control linkage, salvage criteria, and destruction documentation.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS only Evidence: Disposition note |
QC must approve disposition decisions for returned product, including salvage, reprocessing, destruction, or return to inventory.
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-NCMR Evidence: Disposition approvals Destruction records |
| Baseline lacked QC sign-off β direct CGMP violation. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Perform salvage when appropriate.
(Baseline missing contamination risk controls, sanitation requirements, and QC approval.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS only Evidence: Salvage record |
Salvage operations must prevent adulteration, protect product quality, and include environmental and sanitation controls.
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-SAN-CLEAN SOP-WH-STOR Evidence: Salvage logs Cleaning records QC approval |
| Baseline lacked sanitation + environmental controls for salvage activities. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Complete and correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Reprocess if needed.
(Baseline missing scientific justification, QC approval, and post-reprocessing testing requirements.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS only Evidence: Reprocess record |
Reprocessing must be scientifically justified, documented, approved by QC, and must result in a product meeting all specifications.
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-REL SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QA-DEV Evidence: Reprocessing justification BPR addendum QC review |
| Baseline failed to link reprocessing β finished product testing + QC approval. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Review material failures.
(Baseline missing MRB structure, deviation linkage, CAPA integration, and QC disposition authority.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-NCMR only Evidence: MRB form |
Materials failing to meet specifications must undergo MRB review, including QC evaluation and controlled disposition.
SOPs: SOP-QA-NCMR SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-REL Evidence: MRB forms QC disposition logs |
| Baseline lacked CAPA + deviation integration β major oversight. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Record complaints.
(Baseline missing evaluation criteria, investigation requirements, escalation triggers, and CAPA linkage.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT only Evidence: Complaint record |
Complaints must be evaluated, classified, investigated when required, and escalated to returns, reprocessing, CAPA, MRB, or recall assessment as appropriate.
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence: Complaint logs Investigation reports Trend analysis |
| Baseline weak in investigation linkage β FDA frequently cites 111.560 violations. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Perform salvage with care.
(Baseline missing validation, QC approval, and linkage to disposition decisions.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS only Evidence: Record |
Any salvage or reconditioning must be controlled, validated, documented, and approved by QC to ensure resulting product meets all safety and quality requirements.
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-REL SOP-QA-CAPA Evidence: Salvage records QC approvals Reprocessing validations |
| Baseline lacked validation requirement β severe compliance risk. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 44% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart M is now fully compliant. Returned product handling, MRB, salvage, reprocessing, complaint escalation, and QC oversight are all correctly mapped to SOPs and auditable evidence.
This section performs a hybrid redline audit comparing the Baseline Citation Audit v2 to the updated L0 authoritative version for Recordkeeping Requirements. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Records must be kept.
(Baseline failed to mention accuracy, legibility, indelibility, contemporaneous entry, and applicability to all CGMP activities.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-DC only Evidence: Completed forms |
Records must be accurate, legible, indelible, created at the time of performance, and must cover all manufacturing, packaging, labeling, holding, testing, and quality activities.
SOPs: SOP-QA-DC SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-IT-ESIG SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence: Controlled records Timestamped entries Audit trail reports |
| Baseline omitted key CGMP elements (legibility, indelibility, contemporaneous recording). |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Records must contain required data.
(Baseline entirely missed the requirement to identify material, equipment, personnel, signatures, and test results.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-DC only Evidence: Completed logs |
Records must contain all required information, including dates, signatures, identification of material, equipment, personnel, and results of operations or tests performed.
SOPs: Inherited from L0 Governance SOP-QA-DC SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence: Controlled forms Completed batch records Lab data packets |
| Baseline missed >50% of required record content fields. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Retain records for required time period.
(Baseline omitted the actual retention requirements tied to shelf-life vs distribution.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-DC only Evidence: Archive records |
Records must be retained for at least 1 year past the shelf-life date, or 2 years after distribution of the last batch, whichever is longer.
SOPs: SOP-QA-DC SOP-IT-BACKUP SOP-QCL-DATA SOP-WH-INVT Evidence: Record retention logs Archival documentation |
| Baseline failed to cite correct retention timeframe β direct FDA citation risk. |
| Risk: High. |
| New L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Records must be accessible.
(Baseline omitted protection against deterioration, loss, and unauthorized access.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-DC only Evidence: Record storage documentation |
Records must be stored to allow rapid retrieval and must be protected from deterioration, loss, and unauthorized access.
SOPs: SOP-QA-DC SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-IT-BACKUP Evidence: Record archives Access logs Backup restoration reports |
| Baseline did not include data integrity protections β major gap. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Electronic backups must be maintained.
(Baseline omitted requirements for system validation, access control, audit trail integrity, and cross-reference to 111.35(b)(5).)
SOPs: SOP-IT-BACKUP only Evidence: Backup logs |
Electronic systems used for recordkeeping must ensure accuracy, integrity, security, reliable backup, audit trail, and validated operation.
(Cross-ref: 111.35(b)(5))
SOPs: SOP-IT-ACCESS SOP-IT-BACKUP SOP-IT-ESIG SOP-IT-VALIDATE Evidence: Backup logs System validation reports Access control records |
| Baseline missed validation + audit trail + ALCOA+ β severe CGMP deficiency. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| New L0: Correct. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 38% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart N is now fully compliant. All recordkeeping, retention, retrieval, electronic data integrity, and audit trail requirements are correctly mapped to SOPs and auditable evidence based on the SNL Operating Model for a dry-powder dietary supplement contract manufacturer.
This hybrid redline audit compares the Baseline Citation Audit v2 to the updated L0 authoritative requirements for Product Complaint Handling. Redline conventions: removed/incorrect vs added/correct.
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Complaint handling required.
(Baseline missing: classification, investigation triggers, escalation to QC, link to manufacturing/labeling failures, trend analysis.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT only Evidence (Baseline): Complaint log |
Product complaints must be reviewed, evaluated, classified, and investigated when necessary.
QA must determine whether the complaint suggests failure of product quality, packaging, labeling, or manufacturing.
SOPs (Updated): SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence (Updated): Complaint log Investigation reports CAPA files Trend analysis |
| Baseline = incomplete. Missing investigation triggers, CAPA linkage, and escalation structure. |
| Risk: Critical β one of FDAβs most commonly cited deficiencies. |
| Updated L0: Fully compliant and aligned with FDA expectations. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Evaluate complaints.
(Baseline missing objective classification, health-risk triggers, and required escalation.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT only Evidence: Complaint evaluation |
Each complaint must be classified and evaluated to determine whether it requires investigation.
Investigations are mandatory when the complaint suggests contamination, mislabeling, deviation, mixup, or potential health risk.
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA Evidence: Complaint evaluation forms Severity classification logs |
| Baseline lacked classification rules β major FDA concern (misprioritized complaints). |
| Risk: High. |
| Updated L0: Fully compliant with CGMP. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Investigate complaints when needed.
(Baseline missing mandatory investigation content: batch review, lab data, prior history, manufacturing steps, OOS.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT only Evidence: Complaint report |
Investigations must include review of batch records, testing data, complaint history, deviation/OOS information, and product release documentation.
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DEV SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-PROD-BATCH SOP-QCL-DATA Evidence: Investigation reports BPR review documentation OOS/OOT checks |
| Baseline lacked mandatory investigation structure β heavy FDA risk. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| Updated L0: Fully compliant. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Record findings.
(Baseline missing required fields: batch number, investigation results, disposition, follow-up actions.)
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT only Evidence: Complaint file |
Complaint records must include description, batch/lot, actions taken, investigation findings, QC/QA disposition, and required follow-up.
SOPs: SOP-QA-COMPLAINT SOP-QA-DC SOP-QA-REL Evidence: Complaint files Disposition documentation Record retention logs |
| Baseline omitted disposition documentation β direct CGMP violation. |
| Risk: High. |
| Updated L0: Complete. |
| Baseline Version | Updated L0 Version |
|---|---|
|
Escalate serious complaints.
(Baseline missing escalation to returns, reprocessing, CAPA, MRB, and recall assessment.)
SOPs: None listed Evidence: Escalation notes |
Complaints suggesting adulteration, mislabeling, or safety risk must be escalated to returns evaluation, MRB, reprocessing, CAPA, or recall assessment.
SOPs: SOP-QA-RETURNS SOP-QA-RECALL SOP-QA-CAPA SOP-QA-DEV Evidence: Escalation records Recall assessment forms CAPA initiation logs |
| Baseline did not include required escalation pathways β severe FDA vulnerability. |
| Risk: Critical. |
| Updated L0: Fully correct. |
| Baseline Compliance Score: 42% |
| Updated L0 Compliance Score: 100% |
Final Assessment: Subpart O is now fully compliant. Complaint handling, investigation structure, batch review, risk classification, CAPA linkage, and recall escalation are all properly mapped based on the SNL Operating Model for a dry-powder dietary supplement contract manufacturer.