QC-SAMP-001 — Sampling Plan Governance

1. Document Control

Document IDQC-SAMP-001
TitleSampling Plan Governance
Document TypeAuthoritative QC Specification
OwnerQuality Unit (QU)
ApproverQuality Unit (QU)
Effective DateTBD
Versionv2.1
Change Control ReferenceTBD

2. Purpose

Establish enforceable governance requirements for statistically justified, representative, and traceable sampling used to support QC acceptance, rejection, and release decisions under 21 CFR Part 111.

This specification mitigates risk of non-representative sampling, biased lot acceptance, contamination during sampling, undocumented variability, and improper supplier COA reliance.

3. Regulatory Basis

4. Scope

Applies to sampling of components (including dietary ingredients), packaging materials, labels, in-process materials, and finished products where sampling informs QC disposition decisions.

Procedural mechanics are governed separately under controlled SOP/WIN documents.

5. Definitions

6. Acceptance Criteria

Attribute Compliant State Nonconforming State Invalid State Required QMS Entry (W) Required QU Authorization (A)
Sampling Plan Approval Current QU-approved plan in place Expired or superseded plan used No documented approval Deviation Yes if disposition impacted
Statistical Basis Documented statistical rationale (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, √N rule, or equivalent) Reduced sampling without justification No documented statistical rationale Deviation; Change Control if systemic Yes if systemic change
Dietary Ingredient Identity Sampling Each lot sampled per 21 CFR 111.75(a)(1) Reduced sampling without QU authorization Identity sampling omitted Deviation Yes
Container Selection Logic Predefined and documented selection method Deviation from predefined logic No documented source container Deviation No
Chain of Custody Complete lot-to-laboratory traceability Incomplete documentation No traceable link to lot Deviation Yes
Sampling Environment Control Controlled and documented conditions Minor deviation documented Uncontrolled contamination exposure Deviation; Quality Defect if contamination suspected Yes if disposition impacted

7. Decision Logic Matrix

Trigger Condition Execution May Continue? Required Action QMS Process Entry Workflow (W)? QU Authorization (A)? Required Record
Compliant State Yes Record sampling None No No Sampling Record
Nonconforming State Conditional — pending Deviation review Initiate Deviation Deviation SOP Yes Conditional Deviation Record
Invalid State No Invalidate sample; halt use of results Deviation SOP Yes Yes Invalid Sampling Record
Reassessment Trigger Yes Evaluate CAPA CAPA SOP Yes No CAPA Record
Sampling Plan Modification No Submit Change Control Change Control SOP Yes Yes Change Record
Contamination Suspected No Segregate lot; initiate Quality Defect Quality Defect SOP Yes Yes if disposition impacted Quality Defect Record

8. Execution Boundaries

9. Required Records

10. Authority Classification (E / W / A)

E = Execute sampling and record only
W = Entry into Deviation, CAPA, Change Control, or Quality Defect workflow
A = QU authorization required where specified in Acceptance Criteria and Decision Logic Matrix

11. Control State Definitions

12. Change Control

All modifications to sampling plans, statistical methodologies, identity testing reduction, or container selection logic require formal Change Control, documented impact assessment, and QU approval prior to implementation.

13. References