1. Document Control

FieldValue
Document IDQC-IPC-002
Document TitleIn-Process Acceptance Criteria Specification
Versionv1.0
Effective Date03/01/2026
OwnerQuality Unit (QU)
Approval AuthorityQuality Unit (QU)
Change ControlRequired

QC-IPC-002 — In-Process Acceptance Criteria Specification

2. Purpose

This specification establishes objective, enforceable in-process acceptance criteria governing batch progression during manufacturing execution. It defines measurable thresholds, invalid states, escalation triggers, and mandatory Quality Management System (QMS) workflow entries.

This specification mitigates risk of continued processing of nonconforming material, systemic process instability, suppression of out-of-specification results, and unauthorized continuation following control failure.

21 CFR Part 111 requires establishment of specifications, testing and examination to verify conformance, production and process controls, and Quality Unit oversight of quality decisions. Failure to enforce objective in-process decision rules creates regulatory exposure under 21 CFR 111.70, 111.75, 111.80, and 111.105.

3. Regulatory Basis

4. Scope

Applies To: All in-process tests and parameter verifications documented in approved Master Manufacturing Records (MMR) and Batch Production Records (BPR).

Excludes: Finished product release testing and stability testing.

5. Definitions

Compliant State: All acceptance criteria satisfied.

Nonconforming State: One or more acceptance criteria not met.

Invalid State: Record incomplete, instrument outside calibration, missing authorization, or required control undefined.

Escalation Trigger: Objective condition requiring mandatory QMS entry.

Stop-Execution Condition: Execution is prohibited until QMS resolution and QU authorization.

6. Acceptance Criteria

Attribute Compliant State Nonconforming State Invalid State Escalation Trigger Required QMS Process Entry QU Authorization Required?
Measured Parameter Result ≥ LSL AND ≤ USL Result < LSL OR > USL Result missing or altered Any result < LSL OR > USL Quality Event + MRB Yes
Repeat OOS Threshold ≤ 2 consecutive OOS events > 2 consecutive OOS events OOS trend data unavailable > 2 consecutive OOS events Quality Event Yes
Instrument Calibration Status Calibration expiration date ≥ execution date Calibration expiration date < execution date Calibration record unavailable Calibration expiration date < execution date Quality Event Yes
Documentation Timestamp Integrity Entry timestamp = execution date Entry timestamp > 24 hours after execution Timestamp missing or modified Timestamp missing OR > 24 hours after execution Quality Event Yes

Lower Specification Limit (LSL) and Upper Specification Limit (USL) are defined in the approved product specification and/or Master Manufacturing Record (MMR). This specification governs evaluation and decision logic only and does not define product-specific limits.

Systemic and trending evaluation of in-process results, including non-consecutive OOS events, is governed under the Quality Management System trending and CAPA programs and is not controlled within this specification.

6A. Sampling Plan Requirements

Attribute Sampling Type Frequency Sample Size Evaluation Method Sampling Location Sampling Method
[Defined in MMR / Product Specification] Time-based (fixed interval) OR unit-based (defined quantity) Defined in MMR (within QC-established requirements) Defined in MMR (minimum sample size requirements apply) Defined in MMR (e.g., average, individual units, composite sample) Defined in MMR (sampling point must be representative of process output) Representative sample appropriate to material form and process

Sampling parameters defined in the MMR shall comply with Quality Unit-established requirements for sampling frequency, sample size, and evaluation methodology.

7. Decision Logic Matrix

Trigger Condition Execution May Continue? Required Action QMS Process Entry Workflow (W)? QU Authorization (A)? Required Record
Compliant State Yes Continue execution None No No Batch Production Record
Nonconforming State No Execution is prohibited when Nonconforming State occurs. Quality Event Yes Yes Quality Event Record
Invalid State No Execution is prohibited when Invalid State occurs. Quality Event Yes Yes Quality Event Record
Systemic / Repeated Failure (≥ 2 consecutive OOS) No Escalate systemic failure condition. Quality Event Yes Yes CAPA Record

8. Exception Handling

When any result < LSL OR > USL occurs, Quality Event entry is mandatory.

When ≥ 2 consecutive OOS events occur, Quality Event entry is mandatory.

When calibration expiration date < execution date, Quality Event entry is mandatory.

When in-process limits require modification, Change Control entry is mandatory.

9. Authority Classification

E — Execution: Operations execute in-process controls and record results. Execution does not confer disposition authority.

W — Workflow Entry: QA administers required QMS workflow entries.

A — Authorization: QU authorization is required prior to batch continuation following any Nonconforming or Invalid State.

10. Required Records

11. Control State Definitions

Compliant State: All acceptance criteria satisfied.

Nonconforming State: One or more acceptance criteria not met.

Invalid State: Record incomplete, instrument outside calibration, missing authorization, or required control undefined.

Escalation Trigger: Objective condition requiring mandatory QMS entry.

Stop-Execution Condition: Execution is prohibited until QMS resolution and QU authorization.

12. Change Control

Change Control entry required. Independent Quality Unit approval required. No implementation without QU authorization.

13. References