Impact & Risk Assessment Specification

This specification defines the Quality Unit–approved requirements governing identification, evaluation, and documentation of quality, regulatory, and operational risk associated with GMP-impacting changes.

Specification Type:
Authoritative Quality Control specification defining impact and risk assessment governance and decision authority. This document does not define specific risk tools, scoring models, or assessment templates.

1. Purpose

To establish Quality Unit–approved governance requirements ensuring that proposed changes are evaluated for potential impact and risk prior to approval, enabling informed, proportionate, and defensible change decisions.

2. Scope

This specification applies to all GMP-impacting changes subject to change control, including changes to materials, processes, analytical methods, equipment, facilities, systems, documents, and quality controls.

Applicable Business Domains include:

3. Ownership & Governance

Impact and risk assessment requirements defined in this specification shall not be bypassed, minimized, or retrospectively applied outside approved QMS change control.

4. Impact & Risk Assessment Requirements

Assessment Element Requirement Applicability
Change Impact Identification Proposed changes shall be evaluated to identify potential impact to product quality, regulatory commitments, data integrity, and patient or consumer safety. All GMP changes
Risk Evaluation Identified impacts shall be evaluated for likelihood, severity, and detectability using an appropriate risk-based approach. All GMP changes
Scope Determination Risk assessment outcomes shall inform the scope of validation, verification, monitoring, or controls required. All approved changes
Risk Mitigation Where risk is identified, appropriate mitigation measures shall be defined prior to change implementation. Moderate to high-risk changes
Documentation Impact and risk assessments shall be documented, reviewed, and retained as part of the change record. All GMP changes

Risk assessment depth and rigor shall be proportionate to the potential impact of the change.

5. Decision Logic

6. Escalation Requirements

Quality Assurance must escalate to Quality Control or QCO when any of the following occur:

7. Records & Evidence

Records supporting compliance with this specification include, but are not limited to:

This specification defines impact and risk assessment governance and decision authority only. Risk scoring tools, assessment templates, and analytical methods are defined in separate controlled documents and shall not redefine the requirements herein.